- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
EDITORIAL: Obama’s diplomacy by Twitter
Appeasing radical Islam invites a result like the Nigerian kidnappings
Question of the Day
A sunrise that brightens hope in some corner of the planet sometimes exposes suffering somewhere else. Television displays grief half a world away with the brazen kidnapping of hundreds of schoolgirls in Nigeria by a radical Islamist terrorist organization. The plight of these girls tugs at the heartstrings of parents across the United States, and there’s no solution that says “made in America” quite like the power of liberty.
Boko Haram, an al Qaeda knock-off based in Nigeria, is picking on children. In search of headlines to frighten, Abubakar Shekau leads his terrorist band to attack schools, killing boys and kidnapping girls to sell as wives and slaves. Education, they say, is not for girls, and Western learning, which teaches women and girls to think for themselves, is regarded as the worst kind of education, because it’s rooted in Judeo-Christianity and it deprives men of compliant servants.
Michelle Obama was photographed last week holding up a Twitter sign reading “Bring back our girls.” Though they’re not actually “our girls,” her sentiment is spot on — the kidnappings in Nigeria are an affront to human decency. When the misogynist practices of Islam in Africa was to be the subject of Somalia-born Ayaan Ali Hirsi’s speech at Brandeis University the other day, the school’s administration bowed to the liberal left and disinvited her. On that occasion Mrs. Obama showed no interest in standing up for women, lest she offend an Islamist.
Americans are frequently in a quandary over whether they have a responsibility to venture abroad to protect innocent life, particularly when American citizens are not involved. Globalists call the kidnappings a classic case of “responsibility to protect,” in which the “international community” is obligated to intervene when a state fails to protect its own people from atrocity.
Traditionalists say the child abusers of Boko Haram, who do their dirty deeds half a world away from the U.S. homeland, do not constitute a threat to national security. “America,” said John Quincy Adams, “does not go abroad in search of monsters to slay.” Several of his successors have indeed gone on such quests.
While Abubakar Shekau’s videotaped taunts from the jungle are maddening, President Obama’s decision to refrain from action beyond sending FBI and military intelligence personnel to help recover the 276 missing girls is the correct one. If Americans have learned anything during the early stages of the 21st century, it’s that there are not enough bullets for everyone who deserves one.
The terrorism of Boko Haram is rooted in a radical interpretation of Islam that calls for a worldwide caliphate. Naive Western liberals refuse to acknowledge the danger of this virulent ideology. Instead, they take every opportunity to appease the Islamists as a show of their tolerance.
The abuse of women often goes unremarked, and the first lady conducts America’s foreign policy by holding up a sign like a panhandler. Tweets and “raising awareness” won’t save the kidnapped girls in Nigeria. Attention is precisely what the kidnappers seek.
As long as radical Islam maintains a grip on hearts and minds anywhere in the world, such barbarism in the name of Allah will continue. Inevitably, Americans abroad will suffer. The muddled U.S. policy in Somalia 20 years ago led directly to the disastrous retreat that emboldens our adversaries on the continent today.
When Thomas Jefferson was faced with the question of what to do about Muslim extremists taking Americans hostage on the coast of Africa, his answer was the creation of the U.S. Navy. Overwhelming force exacted a peace. At some point, there will be an incident demanding an effective American answer, and Mr. Obama will have to realize appeasement doesn’t work, and he’ll have to prepare the fleet.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare enrollees faking for freebies
- EDITORIAL: Feds harassing the deliveryman
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Investigate airliner downing, but not Benghazi?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Say no to atheist 'chaplains'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Doctor, 2 others shot at Pennsylvania hospital: reports