- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 22, 2014

One of the most celebrated civic activities federal workers stage each year is the annual drive to donate parts of their paychecks to their favorite charities. But it turns out the much-celebrated Combined Federal Campaign has been plagued by misspending, lax oversight and abuse, with federal workers diverting money for massages, personal travel and other unauthorized expenses, according to internal audits.

In some cases, the federal workers who run their charity drives in their local communities have failed to impose even the most basic safeguards against fraud to protect the tens of millions of dollars they raise each year, the audits show.

The list of misconduct and waste is diverse, and spread out throughout the country and even internationally.

PHOTOS: Conservatives in Hollywood: Celebrities who lean right

In Indiana, workers padded their paychecks with $2,400 in “management fees” for helping to run the charity campaign. In Florida, workers paid $650 for tickets to sporting events to reward government workers who brought in the most charity dollars. Employees overseas paid $9,300 for first- and business-class plane tickets. In Louisiana, $322 was spent on flower arrangements.

When faced with an additional $1,413 bill for lunch expenses by the New Orleans campaign, the Office of Personnel Management’s internal inspector general’s office concluded “these were not legitimate CFC expenses since they did not reflect the actual cost of administering the 2009 campaign.”

“Furthermore,” the IG continued, “providing meals during meetings was counterproductive to the CFC’s goal of collecting the greatest amount of charitable contributions possible.”

PHOTOS: Best concealed carry handguns

Many of the worst details of abuse, based on auditors’ reports from the Office of Personnel Management released in April 2012, were reported on Monday by the Washington Examiner.

The IG’s report identified what auditors said was misspending in the CFC program that occurred between 2007 and 2011. Little information is available yet on whether a similar abuse of funds occurred during more recent fundraising campaigns.

The questionable spending the IG identified wasn’t just cash that could have been given to the charities. The errant expenses that were filed are reimbursed by using funds collected from employees — meaning the questionable spending was essentially – if unintentionally – drawing from federal workers’ money that had been donated to the program.

For misspending money that was supposed to go to charity, the guilty workers who misused the Combined Federal Campaigns win this week’s Golden Hammer, an award given by The Washington Times to mark examples of government waste, fraud and abuse.

The most egregious example of waste occurred between 2007 and 2009 — and was reported by the IG two years ago. “Loaned executives” — agency workers selected to assist the fundraising campaigns — in the Washington, D.C. area spent more than $1,000 on a Christmas party and $400 for chair massages.

Plus, the executives ran up a nearly $4,000 tab for lodging and meal expenses they claimed were related to CFC conferences.

In actuality, they were arriving at the conferences early or extending their stays past when the conference ended — and charging the vacation to the charity program.

And to top it all off, between 2007 and 2009, a group of local D.C. workers on a CFC committee bought themselves breakfast and lunch to the tune of $18,000.

The IG said the spending “revealed a culture … where the charging of meals as part of the normal course of business was considered to be an acceptable expense to the campaign.”

Story Continues →