- The Washington Times - Friday, May 3, 2002

SAN FRANCISCO — It's an assault on the senses for morning commuters. First, the stench of urine as they emerge from the subway. Then the sight of crack sellers, heroin users and people using the sidewalk as a toilet.

A train of shopping carts, stacks of bedrolls and sprawled drunken bodies also tell the story of the homeless who have migrated to one of the world's most tolerant cities, where street people get cash handouts of more than $300 a month.

Now, some say San Francisco's compassion is threatening its other reputation as one of the world's most visited and loved cities. That has prompted some residents, businesses and city leaders to rethink their definition of "liberal."

Gavin Newsom, an up-and-coming city supervisor who is expected to run for mayor next year, has proposed tough measures to solve the problem, taking risks that have meant political suicide for a succession of other city leaders. With little open support from his colleagues, he may go to the voters, putting his proposals on the city's ballot this fall.

He says it's time to end the status quo. He even looked to Rudolph W. Giuliani, who as mayor cleaned up New York City's streets by taking on "quality of life" crimes.

"I'm the antithesis of Giuliani. I'm a liberal, but I'm also now maturing to this principle," Mr. Newsom said. "I think Giuliani is right and San Francisco is wrong: It is not compassionate to let people die on the street or feed their addictions."

An estimated 160 homeless people die in San Francisco each year.

Mr. Newsom wants to fine or jail panhandlers standing in street medians. He also wants to cut the city's homeless handout, which ranges from $320 to $395 a month, dispensed by check every two weeks.

Mr. Newsom is under attack from a vocal group of homeless advocates, but he says he is getting mounds of letters, e-mail messages and phone calls that are thankful that someone finally is cracking down.

"You would expect sits-ins and screaming," said Richard DeLeon, a political science professor at San Francisco State University and longtime observer of city policies. "But we didn't get any of that kind of shrieking."

Despite his proposal to fine panhandlers $500 or send them to jail, Mr. Newsom says he isn't advocating locking up the city's estimated 7,300 homeless or shoving them out of sight. He says the answer hinges instead on a "combination of tough love but adequate services."

That combination was what worked in New York, said Steven Cohen, a professor of public affairs at Columbia University. Mr. Giuliani banned sleeping on sidewalks and enforced laws against such offenses as public urination, but he also increased services. "The question is whether you can do both, and Giuliani did it," Mr. Cohen said.

Mr. Newsom wants apartments for the homeless to help them get their lives back on track a place they can call home without worrying about security or getting kicked back onto the streets when shelters close each morning. He also wants a centralized database to track the handouts and services to make sure the city's generosity is not being exploited.

He proposes reallocating cash allowances nearly $11 million annually given to about 2,500 people to affordable housing and treatment programs. The cash handouts fall short of paying for any type of housing in one of the nation's most expensive cities.

Mr. Newsom believes much of the money ends up paying for substances drunk, smoked and injected by the recipients.

Mr. Newsom's ideas frighten Shannon Jurglewich, who picked up her check recently at a Money Mart in the Mission District. She was shocked to learn that Mr. Newsom would slash her monthly allowance to $57.

It costs at least $175 a week to sleep in a residential hotel, which limits her stay to a few nights a month. She said she spends the rest of her check on food, hygiene products and laundry.

"People who screw around with their money, they're messing it up for everybody else," she said. "If they drop it, I don't know what I'm going to do."

Sympathy for people like Miss Jurglewich has thwarted other politicians who tried to tackle the homeless problem.

Mayor Willie Brown, who cannot seek re-election because of term limits, promised to convene a summit on homelessness before he took office in 1996, but later said the problem couldn't be solved. He endorsed a plan to seize the shopping carts stolen by the homeless to carry their meager belongings, then backed off amid fierce protests.

The city now takes carts when they're unattended spending nearly $650,000 annually to collect, clean and store them. The belongings are kept for 90 days, even though most are never retrieved.

Before Mr. Brown, Mayor Frank Jordan planned a police crackdown on street people and got tossed out of office. Mayor Art Agnos also lost re-election, after failing to quickly break up a homeless encampment that became known as "Camp Agnos."

Mr. Newsom won't succeed in "making being poor illegal either," vows Chance Martin of the city's Coalition on Homelessness.

"We've seen just about every piece of legislation he's proposed before and we've defeated them all before," said Mr. Martin, who has been homeless himself.

Mr. Newsom says most other city supervisors privately support him, but he doesn't expect them to risk their careers by voting to cut the cash allowance or jail panhandlers.

Board of Supervisors President Tom Ammiano, another likely mayoral candidate, has advocated a lighter touch for example, giving 24 hours notice before seizing shopping carts, but that idea was knocked down by the rest of the board. He also wants to get the state to help pay for the treatment of mentally ill homeless people a money stream New York City is guaranteed under its state constitution.

But business owners who depend on tourism to pay the bills are ready for some tough action.

"I see the same folks out panhandling. One person has been there for 16 years sitting in front of a business," said Bob Begley, director of the Hotel Council of San Francisco. "Imagine the visitors who come here with their children, and here's somebody urinating and defecating. What do you think they take away with them?"

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide