- The Washington Times - Friday, July 18, 2003

The music industry has won at least 871 federal subpoenas against computer users suspected of illegally sharing music files on the Internet, with roughly 75 new subpoenas being approved each day, U.S. court officials said yesterday.

The effort represents early steps in the music industry’s plan to file civil lawsuits intended to cripple online piracy.

Subpoenas reviewed by the Associated Press show the industry compelling some of the largest Internet providers, such as Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications Inc., and some universities to identify names and mailing addresses for users on their networks known online by nicknames such as “fox3j,” “soccerdog33,” “clover77” or “indepunk74.”

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has said it expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within the next eight weeks. U.S. copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person’s computer, but the RIAA has said it would be open to settlement proposals from defendants.

The campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring Internet-service providers to identify subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music and movie files. The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act permits music companies to force Internet providers to turn over the names of music-pirating suspects upon subpoena from any U.S. District Court clerk’s office, without a judge’s signature required.

In some cases, subpoenas cite as few as five songs as “representative recordings” of music files available for downloading from the users. The Washington-based trade group for the largest music labels, the RIAA, previously indicated its lawyers would target Internet users who offer substantial collections of MP3 song files, but declined to say how many songs might qualify for a lawsuit.

“We would have to look at historic trends, but that is a very high number,” said Alan Davidson of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil liberties group that has argued against the subpoenas. “It doesn’t sound like they’re just going after a few big fish.”

Music fans are fighting back with technology, using software designed to stymie monitoring of their online activities by the major record labels.

A new version of Kazaa Lite, free software that provides access to the service operated by Sharman Networks Ltd., can prevent anyone from listing all music files on an individual’s machine and purports to block scans from Internet addresses believed to be associated with the RIAA.

Many of the subpoenas identified songs from the same few artists, including Avril Lavigne, Snoop Dogg and Michael Jackson. It was impossible to determine whether industry lawyers were searching the Internet specifically for songs by the artists or whether they were popular among the roughly 60 million users of file-sharing services.

The RIAA’s subpoenas are so prolific that the U.S. District Court in Washington, already suffering staff shortages, has been forced to reassign employees from elsewhere in the clerk’s office to help process paperwork, said Angela Caesar-Mobley, the clerk’s operations manager.

The RIAA declined to comment on the numbers of subpoenas it issued.

“We are identifying substantial infringers, and we’re going to whatever entity is providing [Internet] service for that potential infringer,” said Matt Oppenheim, the group’s senior vice president of business and legal affairs. “From there, we’ll be in a position to begin bringing lawsuits.”

A spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said the clerk’s office in Washington is “functioning more like a clearinghouse, issuing subpoenas for all over the country.” Any civil lawsuits would probably be transferred to a different jurisdiction, spokeswoman Karen Redmond said.

Verizon, which has fought the RIAA over the subpoenas with continued legal appeals, said it received at least 150 subpoenas during the past two weeks. There were no subpoenas on file sent to AOL Time Warner Inc., the nation’s largest Internet-service provider and parent company of Warner Music Group. Earthlink Inc., another of the largest Internet providers, said it has received three subpoenas.

DePaul University in Chicago is among the few colleges that received subpoenas; the RIAA asked DePaul on July 2 to track down a user known as “anon39023,” who it said was offering at least eight songs.

There is evidence that the threat of an expensive lawsuit is discouraging online music sharing. Nielsen NetRatings, which monitors Internet use, earlier this week reported a decline of 1 million users on the Kazaa network, with similarly large drops across other services.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide