- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 13, 2003

From the moment expectant parents find out there is a baby on the way, they have myriad choices to make. Cloth or disposable? Breast or bottle? Work or stay home?

Among the most important on the list: What are you going to name the baby? Unlike any of the above decisions, this one sticks with the child for life. Do you go with an old standby such as Katherine or Matthew? Should you look to your cultural heritage? Or go with a trendy name, a unisex name, even a made-up name?

In many cases, it is not an easy choice, says Pamela Redmond Satran, co-author of eight baby name books, including “Beyond Jennifer and Jason, Madison and Montana.” Parents have more choices than ever and also are putting more thought than ever into what moniker to place on their child.

“Since the baby boomlet of the 1980s, there has been a whole culture of the fashionable child,” Ms. Satran says. “We have the Baby Gap, Pottery Barn for Kids and a lot of fashion-conscious, consumer-conscious parents who are putting a lot of thought into what to name their kids.”

Parents are poring over books and even turning to the Internet, where they might ask total strangers what they think of the combination “Crystal Michelle.” Jennifer Moss, a founder of the Web site Babynames.com, says her site has more than 1 million visitors per month. Parents can study the meaning of names and, for a fee, give the Babynames.com staff the task of coming up with a half-dozen ($14.95) or a dozen ($21.95) names.

“They give us criteria, such as if they want a biblical name or a creative name,” Ms. Moss says. “About 3,000 people have used our service.”

Cindy Belsky didn’t turn to experts to help her pick names for her four children, but that does not mean the names came easily to her and her husband, Charlie.

Early in her first pregnancy seven years ago, Mrs. Belsky, who lives in Chantilly, decided if she had a girl, she would name the baby Cadence. The name was unique, had a good flow with their last name and reflected Mrs. Belsky’s interest in music and singing, as Cadence means rhythm in music-speak.

However, the first Belsky child was a boy, and he stayed nameless for two days until his parents came up with a name, Daniel Frederick. The second child was a girl, so the Belskys got their Cadence, whom everyone calls Cady.

The third child, Evan, was named after a recently deceased friend. The fourth child they named Jared after making lists and lists of names, crossing them out and negotiating with one another. The Belskys are expecting a fifth child this fall.

“I have a book with 30,000 baby names in it,” Mrs. Belsky says. “I start flipping through it and write down ones I like or whether they are a possibility. Then I give it to my husband and leave the room. I tell him to cross out what he can’t handle, then rank the rest 1, 2, 3, 4. Right now I like Olivia Page if it is a girl. But Charlie and I are still very far apart on names.”

You’re going to namehim … that?

Names go in and out of fashion, just like nursery wallpaper and Snoopy crib bumpers. For generations, names were basic, usually stemming from the Bible or family traditions, Ms. Satran says.

More recently, names have moved up and down the popularity scale more frequently. Joshua, for instance, was No. 25 in the 1970s but has hovered around No. 4 since the 1980s, according to Social Security Administration data. Emily was No. 10 in 1991 but has been No. 1 since 1996.

“We have never really been able to identify what makes a name popular,” Ms. Satran says. “But it is interesting to see the evolution. The name Mary, for instance, from 1900 to the 1950s was the No. 1 or No. 2 name. It is religious, straightforward. It was unseated at the top spot by Linda in 1950.”

Linda later made way for the Debbies, Marcys and Melissas who are the parents of today’s Jordyns, Caitlyns and Calistas.

The 1950s marked the turn in popular culture in America, Ms. Satran says. As television and music took on more significance, people looked to those avenues as sources for names. With the increase in migration out of cities and into the suburbs — even across the country from other family members — people felt more free to pull up the roots of family names as well.

America also became a more multicultural society in the last few decades of the 20th century, Ms. Satran says. The solid English names of the past (William, Anne) melded into Americanized classics (Amy, Steven, Susan) and then a return to ethnic roots (Gabriel, Aidan, Malik, Leah).

Ron and Sonya Kulik, who have four daughters, used a combination of pop culture and just what sounded pretty when picking out names.

Carly, 10, was named after Carly Simon, and the name for Grace, 5, was inspired by the beauty of the late actress Grace Kelly, Mr. Kulik says. The name for Maddie, 7, was inspired by Maddie Hayes, the character on the old TV show “Moonlighting.” She could go by the more formal Madeline later in life. Corrine, who is 1, got a name “we just liked, and it sounded good with Kulik.”

“Saddling a child with a name is a big thing,” says Mr. Kulik, a Reston chiropractor. “But you can get more creative with girl’s names. We used names that are not the most popular. The younger three don’t have middle names, though, because we didn’t want to use a middle name we liked in case we had another child.”

In 2003, a few trends stand out, Ms. Satran says:

Using last names as first names began in the 1980s, Ms. Satran says. Look into any elementary school classroom today, and there will no doubt be a few Parkers, Hunters or Porters.

Similar to this trend is the use of unisex names, which mirrors the rise of the women’s movement, Ms. Moss says.

“Names like Jordan, Lindsey and Taylor have leveled the playing field for women when they are out there in the world,” she says.

Place names — such as Cheyenne, Dakota, even a Tennessee or two — are popping up everywhere. And Madison (unisex, last name and the capital of Wisconsin) was the No. 2 girls’ name in 2001.

Unique names also stand out. Ms. Satran has a forthcoming book about “cool” baby names.

“To be cool these days, it has to be really cool,” she says. “Parents want to be individual, and they want meaning. Names that combine those two are going to be very popular in the next 20 years.”

Future trends also will include “word names” (such as Destiny, Gardener, Trinity, Autumn) and further popularity of ethnic names, Ms. Satran says.

Rules to follow

Want to raise a jock? A nerd? An assertive woman? Pay attention to what name you choose. Names make an impression before a person does, says Albert Mehrabian, a professor emeritus of psychology at UCLA who has studied name connotations for decades.

“Many people do not think about the quality of names,” he says. “They think they are being creative or clever, but sometimes they are doing their child an injustice.”

Mr. Mehrabian has done several studies asking people to rank names by these characteristics: ethical/caring, popular/fun, successful and masculine/feminine. Names were then ranked by overall attractiveness. High scorers include Alan, Anthony, Benjamin and Elizabeth. Scoring low were Chaz, Butch, Gia and Gertrude.

Similarly, author Bruce Lansky surveyed 75,000 parents for “The Baby Name Survey Book.” Among his findings: Nancy, Kathy and Wendy are friendly; Elliott is brainy; David, John and Samuel are intelligent; and Kirby, Kevin, Chuck and Jim are athletic.

Though the choice of names is very personal and individual, there are a few guidelines to keep in mind:

Think about the future. Do you want Kelleigh to have to spell her name or correct her teacher every time it is mispronounced? Also, Mistee might be cute for a toddler, but will the jury take her seriously should she become a lawyer someday?

“People are not thinking about 25 years from now,” Mr. Mehrabian says.

Check out who else has the same name. Look in books and online to see what the most popular names of the last couple years are, Ms. Moss says. For instance, you might love the name Ashley, but because it’s No. 4 on the 2001 list, there very well may four Ashleys in the classroom in a few years.

Fairfax couple Julia and Greg Malakoff named their first son Benjamin when he was born four years ago. They liked that it was a traditional name, that they were honoring the Jewish custom of naming him after a relative and that they didn’t know anyone else with that name.

Turns out Benjamin was a hot name in 1999. There are three Benjamins in their son’s age group at preschool.

“Of course, none of them are shortened to ‘Ben,’ so they are all called Benjamin, along with their last names,” Mrs. Malakoff says. “The kids in the class think his first name is Benjaminmalakoff.”

Think about what is important to you. Are you honoring a family member or friend? There are ways to do that and still give the baby an individual identity, Ms. Moss says. You can use a family name as a middle name, for instance.

Spell it, say it, write it and write the initials. A name that is too long is going to be tough for young children to say. The general rule is that long last names go better with short first names, and vice versa.

Checking what the initials will spell will ensure you don’t give the child initials such as “U.G.H.” or “H.A.G,” Ms. Moss says.

Also, in dealing with multicultural families, investigate the meaning of the name in several languages. A name that says “beloved” in one tongue may say “angry” in another, for instance.

Learn to compromise with the extended family. Just as everyone will give advice on how to get baby to sleep through the night, relatives will chime in on what to name, or not name, the baby.

You can break tradition if you want to, and many siblings have fought over names for which they previously called dibs. Ms. Moss says there is a way to work it out.

“It is not worth it to fight over a name,” she says. “There are so many names out there.”

Finally, feel free to change your mind once you get a look at your baby’s face.

“I am a strong believer in not naming a child before he is born,” Mrs. Belsky says. “Jared was going to be named Nathan Austin. But he was born and just did not look like a Nathan.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide