- The Washington Times - Saturday, May 17, 2003

OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST, Wash. (AP) — Daniel Hughes loves stealing trees.

He loves the pungent mix of blue chain saw exhaust and spicy fresh wood. He loves the loud snaps that resonate from a Western red cedar as it teeters. He loves slip-sliding on the forest floor in his spiked boots, hauling cedar to his pickup truck in the Olympic National Forest.

He even loves the tension. Stealing trees is, after all, breaking the law.

The only thing Hughes, 38, doesn’t like about cutting down old growth is going to jail, which is where he is now. But that doesn’t happen to tree thieves often.

“There are a lot of trees out there,” Hughes said. “It’s easy to get away with this.”

Tree theft is a problem in forests all over the country, from Washington’s Olympic Mountains to New York’s Adirondacks. The victims are lumber companies, private land owners and the public.

The thieves, forestry specialists say, are mostly chronically unemployed lumbermen seething with resentment over conservation measures that have reduced cutting. They generally feel entitled to what they take.

Hughes put it this way in an interview at Grays Harbor County Jail southwest of Seattle:

“To me it’s like, ‘This land is your land and this land is my land.’ I’m taking my share.”

Major lumber companies, whose woodlands account for about 35 percent of the country’s lumber production, say that 3 percent of the trees cut on their property yearly are carted away by thieves. They estimate their losses at $350 million annually.

Private landowners, who account for 55 percent of U.S. lumber production, don’t track theft as a group; but the American Tree Farm System, which represents them, said their losses are “extreme.”

And U.S. Forest Service officials estimate that as many as one in 10 trees cut in national forests is taken illegally.

A dozen forestry economists consulted by the Associated Press said that, based on the limited data available, thieves may be stealing trees worth $1 billion a year at the sawmill. By comparison, the estimated value of auto theft was about $8 billion last year.

Nevertheless, arrests and prosecutions for tree theft are not common.

The U.S. Forest Service’s timber theft unit was disbanded in 1995, and most state and federal investigators say they are too busy with other crimes to give the problem attention.

Just three persons were charged with stealing trees from U.S. property in 2001, down from 15 in 1996. Even when tree thieves are caught, penalties are usually light — small fines or, in a few states, three or four months in jail.

For tree thieves, this means low risk. With an old-growth cedar, for example, bringing up to $5,000 at the sawmill, the typical timber thief can reap $100,000 from a few days’ work in the woods.

Tree theft, specialists say, is a result of major changes in America’s lumber industry.

Recession in the 1980s caused timber prices to sink, throwing thousands of lumbermen out of work. By then, 98 percent of America’s original old-growth forests had been cut, prompting efforts to conserve what was left. In the prosperous 1990s, the rich increasingly began buying timber land for private estates. And in 1993, the federal government tightened restrictions on cutting old-growth trees on public land to save habitat for threatened spotted owls.

“The spotted owl?” Hughes said scornfully. “Yeah, we saw one [once]. We tried to kill it.”

Hughes was 14 when he first went to work in the woods with his father. As he grew older, he eventually was unable to find work in the declining industry. About 45,000 lumbermen were employed in the United States in 2001, down from about 85,000 in 1989, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

When the Forest Service’s timber theft unit was disbanded, it was replaced with a “fully integrated approach” that made timber theft enforcement the responsibility of every Forest Service employee.

However, the Forest Service has just one uniformed officer or special agent for every 600 square miles of federal forest land, and the job includes investigating arson, protecting archaeological sites and searching for marijuana farms on public property.

Forestry companies try to guard against thefts with their own security firms. But even when they or forest agents catch a tree thief, prosecutors often decline to prosecute, saying other crimes take precedence.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide