- The Washington Times - Wednesday, May 28, 2003


Teenagers at high schools where condoms were available were no more likely to have sexual relations than other teens, a study says.

The study published yesterday backs earlier research on the programs developed in the 1990s to stem the spread of HIV and reduce teen pregnancy. It says students in high schools with condom programs were more likely to use condoms, while students in other high schools were more likely to use other forms of birth control.

Overall, there was no difference in pregnancy rates. The study could not determine if there was an increase in sexually transmitted diseases.

Many conservatives have staunchly opposed condom programs, saying they send the wrong message and encourage and enable teens to have sexual relations before marriage.

Researchers writing in the American Journal of Public Health examined high schools in Massachusetts, where the state Department of Education encouraged schools to develop condom programs. In most cases, the condoms were available from the school nurse or from other personnel such as a gym teacher.

The study took a sample of all high schools, comparing students at nine schools that made condoms available with those at 50 schools that did not. The data came from a 1995 survey of students’ sexual behavior.

They found students in schools with condom programs were slightly less likely to report having had sexual intercourse than those at other schools. Specifically, 49 percent of students at non-condom schools reported having ever had sexual intercourse, compared with 42 percent of those at schools with condoms available.

“The concerns of the small minority of parents who oppose providing condoms or related instruction in schools were not substantiated,” wrote lead author Susan M. Blake and her colleagues at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services.

The study did not compare teenage sexual behavior before and after condom programs were instituted, researchers note, so the study does not prove that the program changed anyone’s behavior.

Opponents of the condom programs seized on that weakness in the study.

“If you look behind the headlines, you’ll see this study is much ado about nothing,” said a statement from Ken Connor, president of the Family Research Council, a conservative group that focuses on social issues.

Mr. Connor said making condoms available “sends kids the wrong message and gives them a false sense of security that they will be protected.” While condoms protect against transmission of HIV, he noted some diseases can be transmitted during sex even with a condom.

Other researchers have also found that condom programs do not encourage teens to have sex, but it’s less clear if they succeed in getting teens to use them, said Douglas Kirby, an expert on teen sexuality at ETR Associates.

He said the controversy surrounding these programs has diminished over time. He guessed that’s largely because once the programs are implemented, people accept them.

“When you go and visit some of these schools, as an outsider you think it’s really a big thing, and you go in and wander into a health clinic and you see a basket full of condoms, and that’s it,” Mr. Kirby said. “That’s what all the hoopla is for.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide