- The Washington Times - Sunday, April 25, 2004

I have seldom seen a more sustained, damaging campaign of character assassination than the attacks on federal Judge Charles Pickering by Senate Democrats and such groups as People for the American Way and the Alliance for Justice. His nomination to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals by the president has been filibustered by the Democrats, and he is now on thatbenchtemporarily through a recess appointment.

The assaults on the judge have been led by Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, who has accused him of “glaring racial insensitivity.” And NAACP Chairman Julian Bond proclaimed that “a vote for Pickering is a vote against civil rights.”

Most damaging has been the charge — carelessly circulated nationwide by many in the media — that Judge Pickering went to extraordinary lengths 10 years ago to lessen the sentence for one of three white men who burned a cross at the home of an interracial couple in Mississippi.

But, at last, in a March 28 “60 Minutes” segment, Mike Wallace restored Judge Pickering’s reputation in a report from Mississippi showing 16 million CBS viewers the actual facts of Judge Pickering’s record — on and off the bench.

As for Judge Pickering’s “glaring racial insensitivity”: In 1966, after civil-rights leader Vernon Dahmer was killed by a firebomb, Ku Klux Klan commander Sam Bowers was charged with the murder. As a county prosecutor, Judge Pickering, at considerable peril to his life, testified that Bowers had a history of violence. When Judge Pickering was subsequently defeated in a re-election bid for the state legislature, the Klan bragged it had caused his defeat.

Moreover, Judge Pickering said to Mr. Wallace that when racism was rife in Mississippi “we sent our children to the integrated schools, even though there was a good private school less than a block from our home. We supported integrated public education.”

As a defense lawyer during the early 1980s, Judge Pickering continued, he took the case of “a young black man who was charged with robbing a young white girl at knifepoint. And it was not a popular case for me to takeon.ButI thought he was innocent and that he needed a defense. I didn’t think he would have gotten a good attorney otherwise. He was acquitted.”

With regard to the cross-burning case, the fact (as journalists from the New York Times, National Review, Atlanta Journal-Constitution and I have reported) is that Judge Pickering acted in the interest of justice.

Two of the white cross-burners accepted plea bargains and served no jail time. One of them was the ringleader, who had shot into the house before the cross-burning took place and had a history of violenceagainst blacks.

The third defendant, Daniel Swan, who had no such record, was offered a much harsher plea deal with jail time and went to trial instead. Judge Pickering told Mr. Wallace that it was the worst case of disproportionate sentencing he had ever seen.

Accordingly, he pressured federal prosecutors to drop part of Swan’s conviction under the federal “hate crime” laws so that Judge Pickering could sentence him to 27 months in jail rather than 7-1/2 years. The National Review reported that one of the prosecutors eventually wrote that “he personally agreed with the judge that the [original] sentence was draconian.”

Also on “60 Minutes,” Mr. Wallace emphasized that “many black attorneys who practice before him say Pickering is fair and first-rate.” One of them, Deborah Gambrell, a Democrat, said she has appeared before him year after year, including representing the NAACP in a case, and was “shocked and appalled” at the charges that Judge Pickering is “insensitive on racial issues.”

Judge Pickering told Mike Wallace that “to accuse a white Southerner of being a racist is about the worst thing you can do. I have worked for more than three decades trying to provide better relations between the races, trying to protect equal rights. That’s my core being. And they’ve attacked that.”

Yet, in a series of ongoing editorials on Judge Pickering, the New York Times continues to find him wanting on civil rights and keeps repeating that his action in the cross-burning case disqualifies him from sitting on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, despite contrary facts raised by the paper’s own reporters.

As for Mr. Schumer — the Democrats’ hit man on Judge Pickering — he told Mr. Wallace that “the bottom line is if Judge Pickering were so sensitive to the long and sad racial history in Mississippi, he would never have done what he did with the case of cross-burning.”

Paraphrasing what a defense attorney said to Joe McCarthy in the Army-McCarthy hearings on alleged Communists in our land: At long last, Sen. Schumer, have you no sense of decency?


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide