- The Washington Times - Sunday, August 8, 2004

This is the second of two columns on the genocide in Darfur, in the west of Sudan:

Although Congress unanimously accused the Sudanese government of genocide the week before the Democratic convention, Sen. John Kerry made no mention of the atrocities there while gilding his foreign-policy experience in his speech at the convention. In his campaign to be the leader of the free world, Mr. Kerry might at least have mentioned how Darfur is dividing the world between nations who practice human rights and those who abuse them.

From Cairo, the Arab League is conducting a campaign to prevent any meaningful sanctions on the Khartoum government. The New York Sun quotes a “diplomat from a moderate Arab state,” who, requesting anonymity, says he was ashamed at the Arab League’s refusal to help stop the killings (more than 50,000 so far) and the often-repeated rapes of women and children by the government-supported Janjaweed militia.

As one African Union representative told the BBC on July 30, the AU has become actively involved because of “the deteriorating situation in Darfur,” despite Khartoum’s so-called commitment to disarm the Janjaweed. AU monitors (there as part of its first military mission in a member state) reported seeing Janjaweed victims chained and burned alive.

According to the BBC, Rwanda, reacting to what it calls “a humanitarian crisis,” says it is ready and willing to send troops as monitors. But Egypt claims it does not have enough facts on what’s happening in Darfur to jump to any conclusions.

Yet the actual ghastly facts on the ground have been shown nightly on Arab satellite television channels. Meanwhile, the Khartoum government, according to a report by Benny Avni in the July 30 New York Sun, has closed al Jazeera offices in Sudan.

If this dictatorship has been really reining in the Arab Janjaweed, as it claims, why would it censor al Jazeera? In fact, as the BBC noted, while Khartoum has trumpeted the arrests and convictions of a small number of the Janjaweed, none of the leaders of that homicidal militia have been taken into custody. The humanitarian coordinator for Sudan characterized this as “a culture of immunity” for the leadership of the Janjaweed. What about the leadership of the Khartoum government?

The European Union is putting vigorous pressure on Khartoum, yet Algeria and Pakistan — ignoring the atrocities against their fellow Muslims in Darfur — choose solidarity with the Muslim government of Sudan. And amid the continuing killings and rapes, the sovereign nations of Russia and China have been trying to block any meaningful action against Khartoum.

Those two countries have more pressing interests, as a July 28 Wall Street Journal editorial underlines: “Russia’s MiG corporation has just dispatched two new MiG-29 fighters to Sudan out of a total order of 12 fighter jets, a deal worth around $200 million. And the company badly needs the cash.”

As for compassionate China, the Journal points out, Sudan wants to increase its oil production, and vital to the plan is “Block 6, an oil field partly located in southern Darfur … These reserves have certainly caught Beijing’s attention. The concessions for Block 6 are in the hands of the China National Petroleum Corp., the biggest foreign investor in the Sudanese oil industry.”

Have Mr. Kerry’s foreign-policy advisers informed him of this kind of hideous realpolitik, which he’ll be dealing with should he become the leader of the free world?

At the U.N. Security Council, which has been thoroughly briefed on the carnage by Secretary-General Kofi Annan and other U.N. officials who have been to Darfur, the United States was pressured to remove the word “sanctions” from its proposed resolution threatening Khartoum with punitive measures if it doesn’t stop the atrocities. The Security Council members wishing to give Khartoum more time were unimpressed with a report by U.N. spokesman Marie Okabe, which stated, as the New York Times reported July 29: “United Nations staff members had interviewed 38 women and girls who said they had been raped in the past week, sometimes repeatedly, by Janjaweed fighters.”

On July 30, the United Nations — with China and Pakistan abstaining — passed the U.S. resolution requiring Khartoum to disarm and prosecute the Janjaweed within 30 days. Khartoum says it will comply with the resolution, but adds the measure does not go beyond its previous commitments. Those, however, have already been broken.

After 30 days, there will have to be subsequent monthly reports from Khartoum to the United Nations, and probably another Security Council vote to actually insert the word “sanctions” into another resolution. The delays will likely accompany more killings and rapes, and acute hunger as the rainy season has closed more access to those driven from their homes. This entire scenario is tragically all too familiar.

Anyone remember Rwanda?

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide