- The Washington Times - Thursday, January 13, 2005

What’s the newest word getting into the dictionary for the new year? Miriam Webster’s editors announce it is “blog” — defined as “a Web site that contains an online personal journal with reflections, comments, and often hyperlinks provided by the writer.”

So hoist a glass to toast perhaps the most famous “blogger” of 2004 — a brilliant Atlanta lawyer nicknamed “Buckhead.” He’s the pajama-clad fellow, along with a follow-up host of other Internet truth seekers, who struck a telling blow at anchor Dan Rather and his CBS TV “60 Minutes II” by quickly analyzing and questioning the proportionally spaced fonts used in the so-called National Guard records of George W. Bush.

“Buckhead” — who’s real name is Harry MacDougal — spends many a wee hour on his computer surfing the “blogosphere.” The Georgian first challenged CBS in a posting on the FreeRepublic.com Web site. “I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old,” he wrote barely four hours after Mr. Rather’s Sept. 8 show unveiled its “scoop.” Within minutes, other bloggers were using their Internet superhighway to further analyze the typefaces — not known to have been used in 1972 typewriters — to reinforce my friend’s suspicions and to tweak aggressive news outlets into doing some investigative reporting.

A few days later, as establishment media experts were finally weighing in against a smug and defiant Mr. Rather (who apologized 14 days later), one exultant FreeRepublic.com groupie declared in a succinct posting: “Buckhead for the U.S. Supreme Court.”

My friend, though, is a modest man. He later reflected: “As for my part, this tsunami would, without any doubt, have happened w/o me, so it ain’t no big thang I will have a cold one tonight, though.”

Yet it really is a “big thang.”

As the Wall Street Journal later noted editorially, “this is potentially a big cultural moment.” It underscored that the widespread challenge to Mr. Rather — to his “reporting” credibility — “means that the liberal media establishment has ceased to set the U.S. political agenda.”

Is the liberal media dead? Of course not. Peter Jennings and his clones at your local TV stations and newspapers will still seek to spread their version of “the news.” But we’ve come a long way from 1981, when Ted Turner, of all people, openly complained about CBS’ “liberal bias” and unsuccessfully tried to buy the network.

The Internet, for all its faults, turned out in 2004 to be a good friend to the American people when it comes to ferreting out the truth. As a longtime journalist, I often struggled to find “experts” and “insiders” who could help me understand and explain some event. Now the World Wide Web immediately connects us to them all.

Remember that the big media elite scoffed at, and barely reported on, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and its ads regarding presidential candidate John Kerry. That arrogance and mind control flies in the face of what was once taught in Journalism 101— try to get all sides of the story and report the facts to the reader or viewer. But the alternative media, ranging from the bloggers to talk radio, effectively fought back by having an open debate with shared information.

The truly dark side of modern liberalism can be seen in the rise of a “politically correct” news media. It has not been receptive to political conservatives and our traditional Judeo-Christian culture — and it has gone out of its way in recent years to condone and even glorify everything from drug use to same-sex marriage. Since the culturally corrosive Woodstock era, the “old media” led by CBS and the New York Times increasingly mocked traditional values and lifestyles as outmoded, racist and intolerant. Their unofficial motto evolved from that 1969 rock/drug/sex festival — “If it feels good, do it.”

In 2004 the “Buckheads” of America pushed back in a counter-revolution.

Yes, there are objective journalists around our country in the mainstream media who are intellectually honest and who ply their trade well. But they, too, should welcome to their world these new watchdogs. The talented and more enterprising are even developing a loyal following.

So cheers to all those “Buckheads” for getting “blog” into the dictionary. A competitive marketplace of information, opinion, analysis and questioning can only serve the truth and help inform the electorate. And it can do it pretty fast in “the blogosphere.” That is a “big thang.”

Phil Kent is an Atlanta media consultant and author of “The Dark Side of Liberalism.”

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide