- The Washington Times - Thursday, March 10, 2005

Given the deplorable moral condition of the United Nations over the past dozen years, I have longed for a U.S. representative of the quality of Pat Moynihan or Jeane Kirkpatrick. Admittedly a Moynihan or a Kirkpatrick are rare finds, but surely some stentorian voice could be found to abuse the United Nations with a recitation of democratic values. Now President Bush has found one in nominating the State Department’s John Bolton to serve where Mr. Moynihan and Mrs. Kirkpatrick served so memorably.

How fine a choice is Mr. Bolton? Well consider this response from Sen. Jean-Francois Kerry: “This is just about the most inexplicable appointment the president could make to represent the United States to the world community.”

As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, our Francophile friend will be reviewing Mr. Bolton’s nomination. For his appearance before Mr. Kerry’s committee I suggest Mr. Bolton bring along a copy of Michelin’s Guide Rouge. Get the senator off on a discussion of his favorite Parisian restaurants. Ask him how he likes his canard. In fact, congratulate him on his canard. Inquire as to why the French can never get the vichyssoise to the table while it is still warm. The senator is easily distracted.

This bosh about the “world community” is a favorite refuge from reality for Mr. Kerry and his liberal friends. The reality is his “world community” sat back and allowed barbarism to endure in hellholes such as Rwanda and the Sudan. It has allowed rogue nations to acquire weapons of mass destruction and to pose a threat to world peace out of all proportion to each nation’s strength and importance. When Mr. Moynihan and Mrs. Kirkpatrick defended democratic values at the United Nations, they faced both a military threat (the Soviet Bloc) and an ideological threat (Marxist Leninism) that threatened the very existence of Western civilization. The threat of today’s rogue states is the threat of a homicidal nuisance. They can disrupt civilization but have no alternative to it. That is why it is so absurd to allow them to continue as threats.

Mr. Bolton has referred to North Korea as “a hellish nightmare” governed by a “tyrannical dictator.” Ah, the lilt and substance of Mr. Moynihan and Mrs. Kirkpatrick is about to be restored to the Security Council and the General Assembly.

On another occasion, Mr. Bolton wrote if the glass zoo on the East River that is United Nations headquarters “lost 10 stories, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.” I look forward to more of this kind of eloquence.

Certainly the moral condition of the U.N. is not likely to improve soon. In the 1970s and 1980s, when Mr. Moynihan and Mr. Kirkpatrick represented us, the threat to America was mostly ideological and a matter of power politics.

The U.N. did of course allow Zionism to be equated with racism. It did see a moral equivalence between the West and the Soviets. But the moral quality of the U.N. has actually worsened in the absence of the Soviets. U.N. peacekeepers now are guilty of rape and rampage in Africa. Even its bureaucrats have been caught in sexual harassment, to say nothing of graft.

The oil-for-food scandal is probably the largest instance of corruption ever recorded. And the anti-Semitism at the U.N. is even more rampant. Recall, if you will, the 2001 Durban international racism meeting that seethed with anti-Semitism.

Finally there is the absurdity of the U.N.’s Human Rights Commission, where such nations as Cuba and Zimbabwe pass on the alleged human-rights abuses of Americans.

Mr. Bolton will cut through this corruption, at least with oratory if not with policy. At the State Department, Mr. Bolton has fashioned some memorable policy, perhaps the most useful being the Proliferation Security Initiative.

At the U.N., it is hard to see what policies Mr. Bolton can get adopted. Its corruption is so extensive, and the United States is but one member against the mob. But Mr. Bolton can sober the assembled popinjays by pointing out each U.N. failure.

The U.N. no longer has any value in maintaining the peaceful intercourse of nations. Possibly Mr. Bolton will fulfill the historic role of becoming America’s last ambassador to the U.N. No gravy train lasts forever.

R. Emmett Tyrrell is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. His latest book is “Madame Hillary: the Dark Road to the White House.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide