- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 31, 2005

M0MAn afford to buy a house in this place?” my wife asked, when I read her the average prices of homes in various northern California communities.

“We certainly can’t,” I said. Our home has more than doubled in value since we bought it 11 years ago. We couldn’t live here if we had to pay today’s prices. This is not unusual on the peninsula stretching from San Francisco to Silicon Valley.

Home prices can be very misleading in this area because many — if not most — people here never paid those prices. These are the prices of current home sales. They are the prices newcomers have to pay.

That fact has much to do with skyrocketing home prices. The people who vote on the laws that severely restrict building, create costly bureaucratic delays, and impose arbitrary planning commission notions need not pay a dime toward the huge costs imposed on anyone trying to build anything in the San Francisco Bay area. Newcomers get stuck with those costs.

The biggest is the cost of the land rather than the houses themselves. The average price of homes is a million dollars in some San Francisco Bay area communities, where it would be hard to find a single house anyone would call a mansion.

Nor are there many new homes being built in these communities. Old homes are simply being bid up in price, precisely because it is either impossible or ruinously expensive to build new homes.

Unlike other places, where people trying to sell their houses usually have an asking price they bring down somewhat in the course of negotiations with a prospective buyer, in the San Francisco Bay area the asking price is usually bid up during the competition among people who want to buy.

Someone who bought a home for $100,000 in the 1970s may put it on sale for $700,000 today — and watch the buyers bid it up to $900,000. The average price in San Mateo County, where it is nearly impossible to build anything, is $921,000. There are many nice middle-class homes in San Mateo County, and some rather modest homes, but very few mansions.

One of the county’s middle-class communities is Foster City, a planned community built back in the 1960s. When the first homes were sold there in 1963, a three-bedroom house could be bought for as little as $22,000. If you wanted something bigger or fancier, or in a more scenic location, you could still get it for less than $50,000. Today, the average price of a home in Foster City is $1.2 million.

People who wring their hands about a need for “affordable housing” seldom consider that the way to have affordable housing is to stop making it unaffordable. Foster City housing was affordable before the restrictive land use laws made all housing astronomically expensive. Contrary to the vision of the left, the free market produced affordable housing — before government intervention made housing unaffordable.

None of this is rocket science. Anyone who understands supply-and-demand concepts can understand that putting most of the land in a whole county off-limits to building will cause the price of the remaining land to rise.

It is the land, rather than the houses built on it, which has become astronomically expensive in places with extreme “open space” laws and other severe land use restrictions. In some places without such laws, a house can be bought for a fraction of what that same house would cost in parts of California.

Those who push restrictive laws and policies often try to blame everything else for high housing costs. “Overpopulation” is one such red herring. In reality, San Mateo County has lost 9,000 people in the last four years while housing prices soared.

Ironically, a consummately selfish policy of creating costs that force newcomers to pay high prices that existing homeowners do not have to pay is often wrapped in the mantle of idealism and washed down with pious expressions of hope for some way to try to create “affordable housing.”

Thomas Sowell is a nationally syndicated columnist.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide