- The Washington Times - Friday, September 30, 2005

Extremists at the grandiosely named Americans United for Separation of Church and State are at it again. The group, best known for trying to drive religion from the public square, now wants to make sure no faith-based organizations are reimbursed for rescuing and caring for thousands of victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has announced plans to allow some faith-based groups to recoup some of what they’ve spent feeding, clothing, housing and counseling more than 500,000 people stranded in the worst national disaster this country ever faced.

FEMA officials have said religious organizations can only be reimbursed if they operated shelters or undertook other emergency activities at the request of state and local officials in affected states. That’s not enough for the rigid secularists.

“What really frosts me about all this,” the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of AUSCS, complained to The Washington Post, “is, here is an administration that didn’t do its job and now is trying to dig itself out by making right-wing groups happy.” He might have been more honest if he admitted that what really angers the anti-religion left is how much more effective than Big Government private and religious groups are in getting things done.

While Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco tried to figure out how and when to exercise her authority to call in the National Guard and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin was cussing the feds on a local radio station, the Red Cross and Salvation Army were moving food and medical supplies to the region.

While FEMA was giving antisexual harassment training to prospective volunteers before they could serve in the affected areas, churches and missions were setting up cots and cooking meals for their desperate neighbors.

Joe Becker, senior vice president for preparedness and response at the Red Cross, says he believes “it’s appropriate for the federal government to assist the faith community because of the scope of the effort and how long it’s lasting.”

According to Mr. Becker, churches normally only provide shelter and other services for the first few days after a disaster before the Red Cross steps in to take over. But these storms have been so devastating church facilities are being used indefinitely to care for the evacuees. Mr. Lynn told The Post asking for reimbursement was “a strange definition of charity,” and that he didn’t think it was appropriate for the government to “pay for their good works.”

In fact, the government has a long history of working with sectarian organizations to care for the needy. In 1980, Congress passed legislation that allowed groups such as Catholic Charities, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, and World Vision to assist refugees to the United States, providing direct financial aid through these groups, as well as training and other services.

President Bush’s faith-based initiative modestly expanded the ability of religious groups to deliver social services. All religious groups that receive government money, however, must strictly ensure it not be used to fund inherently religious activities, must separate out funds used for religious purposes and demonstrate they have done so to the government’s satisfaction. These groups can’t deny services to those who don’t share their religious views or who belong to different religions, though they may restrict their hiring to co-religionists.

Faith-based groups are often a more effective provider of services to the needy than large, impersonal government bureaucracies. If there was any lesson learned from Katrina and Rita, it should be that government often doesn’t perform up to expectations. It makes no sense to penalize the very groups that readily took up the slack when government and even large private groups like the Red Cross were overwhelmed.

In fact, the government should expand the reach of these groups to help victims rebuild their lives.

Linda Chavez is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide