- The Washington Times - Monday, September 5, 2005

Today, the U.S. Senate is poised to either drive a stake through the heart of the most confiscatory tax ever enacted or to go wobbly and allow this cruel, job-robbing, antigrowth estate tax to live on in infamy.

In the Senate, the high-water mark to repeal was 57-43 but because of the filibuster threat, it takes 60 votes. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican, is to be commended for calling for an up-or-down vote on repeal, resisting the admonition of the “deal-makers and the compromisers” who somehow didn’t seem to get the message from the House, “Kill The Death Tax, Don’t Wound It.”

As the person credited with popularizing the term “death tax” for the estate tax, I will not be ready to retire until this tax is permanently killed. In my 40-plus years in the nation’s capital, first as a newspaper reporter and now as an activist on behalf of seniors, I’ve seen a lot of taxes come but not many go. This is a tax whose time to go has surely come.

It serves no useful purpose. It’s not a revenue raiser, it’s a revenue loser. It’s not a tax cut for the rich, they don’t pay it. It enriches only lawyers, accountants and insurance brokers. It hinders job expansion. It discourages savings. It encourages consumption. It hurts new minority-owned businesses. Death tax repeal is bipartisan. The death tax deserves to die.

To paraphrase Milton Friedman, Nobel Laureate economist: “Because of the death tax, there’s little need to save. You may as well spend your money on wine, women and song as to save it.” Mr. Friedman is absolutely right. How disgusting is it that the first claimant in line when a loved one dies is Uncle Sam, not even a blood relative?

To those in the Senate who say the compromise they are crafting could be lost by insisting on a vote to repeal, I say to the “House of Lords” please be so kind, so ever benevolent, as to look at what your brethren did in the “House of Commons.” They passed absolute repeal neither by a razor-thin nor a party-line vote but by a whopping 110-vote bipartisan margin, 272-162, with more than 40 Democrats and seven members of the Congressional Black Caucus voting for outright repeal. As a matter of fact, Caucus member Rep. Sanford Bishop, Georgia Democrat, said it best, “I believe the death tax is politically misguided, morally unjustifiable and downright un-American.”

Why in heaven’s name can’t the Senate stop tinkering with this abomination of a tax and simply do the right thing? Repeal it.

You will not be tagged with “helping the rich” because the so-called rich don’t pay it — they set up trusts and foundations.

As for those cute wordsmiths who call repeal of the death tax the “Paris Hilton Relief Act,” have they never heard of the Hilton Foundation? What an insult to hard-working small businesses and to seniors who have accumulated substantial wealth after a lifetime of hard work and savings.

The 60 Plus Association contracted two polls that produced similar results: one by a 77 percent margin, the other by 73 percent, both concluding Americans would be “more likely to vote for their member of Congress if they voted to eliminate the death tax.” Those polled cited the unfairness of a tax on after-tax assets. The bottom line: Voting to repeal this tax is a winner, and it has steamrolled popular legislators who dared get in the way of its permanent elimination. But don’t believe me — ask former Sen. Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat.

The 2006 mid-term elections are not far off. Were I in either the House or the Senate, I would be particularly mindful of being on the wrong side of death tax repeal.

Clear-thinking Americans understand what Professor Edward McCaffery, the self-described “unrequited liberal” who now favors abolishing the tax, has said, “To most people, death seems like the wrong time to tax.”

Over the years, in an effort to shame Congress into repeal, more than 40 names have been suggested for this tax, some macabre but succinct. A few: Grave Robber’s Tax, Exit Tax, Cruel Tax, Success Tax, Pine Box Tax, Tombstone Tax, Feet First Tax, Soul Tax, Stiffest Tax of All. and the Last Grasp Tax.

Our battle cry at 60 Plus has always been “Dying should not be a taxable event.”

James L. Martin is president of the 60 Plus Association, a grass-roots seniors group headquartered in Arlington, Va.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide