- The Washington Times - Saturday, June 10, 2006

In your writings and your talks, you say parenting is common-sensical. Can you explain what you mean by that?

A: I think all God’s creatures know how to properly raise their young. If a certain creature did not possess that knowledge, the species wouldn’t survive.

Humans have survived because we know how to raise children. We knew how to be parents before there were people like me giving parenting advice. In fact, I think we generally did a better job of raising children before there were people like me.

Ironically, I believe parents will begin to regain the common sense of raising children when they stop listening to people like me. I think our collective common sense concerning children has been swamped by a tidal wave of psychobabble that has lasted some 40 years now.

Q: Are parents trying to be psychologists where their children are concerned?

A: Today’s parents tend to think psychologically about their children.

A child does something that might be somewhat out of the ordinary, and instead of just responding to it matter-of-factly or ignoring it, the parents try to understand it. They try to interpret it, to figure out what it supposedly means or represents. That’s psychological thinking, and it always leads parents into an intellectual labyrinth inside of which things just get more and more complicated and difficult.

Children are simple. They wear their emotions on their sleeves, and the reasons why they do the sometimes odd things they do are not complex. Good parenting is done through the heart, not the head. However, today’s parents try to do it primarily through their heads. They think about it too much, and an intellectual approach to child rearing simply doesn’t work. It trips you up.

Q: You seem to believe it’s more important for parents to discipline properly than to have good relationships with their children.

A: Well, that’s a bit simplistic. I believe discipline fundamentally is leadership. I believe if you lead your child properly, a good relationship will result. The problem with today’s parents is that too many of them are putting the relationship ahead of leadership, and that’s like trying to get the cart to pull the horse.

Q: Can you talk a bit more about discipline being leadership? That’s a new idea, isn’t it?

A: No, it’s not. Until relatively recently, parents understood that the proper discipline of a child was accomplished through proper leadership. The modern parent thinks proper discipline is accomplished by manipulating reward and punishment. That has happened because today’s parents believe behavior modification will solve all of their problems. Leadership, by contrast, is not a methodology. It’s primarily constituted of clear communication, decisiveness and an overriding ethic of doing what’s best for others.

Furthermore, the principles of effective leadership are the same if you’re leading a child or if you’re leading a group of employees in a corporate environment. When parents begin understanding that, parenting will become a simple thing again.

Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents’ questions on his Web site (www.rosemond.com).

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide