- The Washington Times - Saturday, October 14, 2006

Albert Einstein is credited with defining insanity as “doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different outcome.”

This Einstein is, of course, the Nobel physicist whose 1939 letter on atomic fission to President Franklin Roosevelt resulted in the Manhattan Project — and the development of the first A-bomb.

In the wake of North Korean “product demonstration” and claim to have detonated a nuclear weapon, U.S. decisionmakers should heed the late scientist’s pithy observation — for our policy toward the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), certainly seems to fit the definition. It’s time to face the facts: None of the “diplomatic initiatives” the U.S. has tried since 1945 have worked to prevent North Korea from becoming a serious threat to U.S. national security.

The post-World War II “diplomatic” decision to partition the peninsula at the 38th Parallel allowed the creation of a family-run, Stalinist dictatorship. When the DPRK invaded the democratic Republic of Korea on June 25, 1950, the U.S. took the case to the United Nations. Two days later, the U.N. Security Council resolved to “repel the armed attack” — not to “unify” the two countries.

Even this measure would have failed had the Russians — with veto power — not been absent when the vote was taken. The resulting four-year-long Korean War cost the lives of 54,229 U.S. servicemen and ended in a “diplomatically negotiated” stalemate right where it began — on the 38th Parallel.

Subsequent “diplomatic initiatives” have fared no better. In the 1990s, faced with the prospect of the North developing advanced missile and nuclear technologies — while millions of North Koreans starved — the U.S. engaged in lengthy bilateral diplomatic discussions aimed at convincing the militant regime to cease and desist.

The 1994 “Agreed Framework” has proven to be a disaster. The agreement required Pyongyang to stop all nuclear weapons development and the U.S. to provide North Korea with billions in foreign aid and two light-water nuclear reactors for generating electricity. We complied. They lied.

By the time George W. Bush arrived in Washington, it was apparent “bilateral diplomacy” hadn’t worked. When U.S. and allied intelligence services reported Kim Jong-il was secretly accelerating missile and nuclear weapons development, the Bush administration decided to try a “multilateral” approach — the so-called Six-Party talks — with U.S., North Korean, South Korean, Japanese, Chinese and Russian diplomats all at the same table. Now, after last week’s claimed nuclear test, it should be clear this “diplomatic effort” has failed as well.

President Bush acknowledged as much in his press conference on Oct. 11: “With its actions this week, North Korea has once again chosen to reject the prospect for a better future offered by the Six-Party joint statement. Instead it has opted to raise tensions in the region.”

The key words in the president’s statement are “once again” and “raise tensions in the region.” The “once again” observation is a reminder of Einstein’s insanity definition. The “raise tensions in the region” proclamation is a gross understatement. Here’s why:

Cash-strapped North Korea’s only exports are counterfeit U.S. currency, illicit drugs and rocket/missile technology. Pyongyang’s No. 1 customer for these “products” is Tehran. The Iranian Shahab 3 and Shahab 5 missiles are identical in design and performance with North Korea’s Nodong and Taepo Dong missile series. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made it clear neither “diplomacy” nor U.N. sanctions will stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Using words remarkably similar to statements by Kim Jong-il, Mr. Ahmadinejad describes U.S., European, U.N. Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency diplomatic efforts to deter Iran’s nuclear program as “useless resolutions.”

It requires the willful suspension of disbelief to trust that Iran — awash in petro-dollars — won’t try to buy North Korean nukes. Put differently, if you think the jihad waged against us is a tough fight now, just wait until Islamic radicals have North Korean nukes. At that point, the “caliphate” of which Mr. Bush spoke on Wednesday will be a foregone conclusion.

It need not happen — if we abandon the process that has repeatedly failed in the past. Mr. Bush says he wants to “give diplomacy a chance.” He added, “there must be a strong Security Council resolution” to cause North Korea “to dismantle its nuclear programs.” Past performance ought to tell us that won’t work.

Instead of going back to the U.N. — where Kofi Annan insists “the U.S. and North Korea should talk,” Mr. Bush would do better to recall Congress into session until it fully funds and deploys the U.S. ballistic missile defense system; send more Patriot Pac III and Aegis defense systems to our Asian allies; and resolve to form a new alliance of Asian/Pacific democracies to ensure that the DPRK cannot export its nuclear and rocket technologies by sea or air.

Firm U.S. leadership would be welcome by Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. Building such a coalition — instead of repeating what failed in the past would offer hope we really aren’t insane.

Oliver North is a nationally syndicated columnist and the host of “War Stories” on the Fox News Channel. His special, “Investigating the Jihad” airs Sunday at 8 p.m. Eastern and Pacific.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide