- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 10, 2007

WOODSTOCK, N.Y. (AP) — Michael Esposito rides his bike all the time — from cold nights when leaving his old job at a natural-food store to warm days while passing shops selling yoga clothes and soy drinks.

So the 67-year-old biker is excited about a new plan to reduce this countercultural haven’s net carbon dioxide emissions to zero within a decade, an ambitious attempt to erase the town’s “carbon footprint.”

“It’s more than important,” Mr. Esposito said. “It’s a necessity.”

Even sympathetic specialists call it challenging. It likely would require many of the town’s roughly 6,200 people to install solar panels and geothermal hookups. But it’s tough to find a resident who doesn’t support the project.

“So why not declare that within 10 years we’re going to set a visionary goal?” asked Randolph Horner, a renewable-energy project developer and a driving force behind the initiative.

Woodstock is best known for the 1969 rock concert that borrowed its name and was held about 50 miles away in Bethel. But the old artists’ colony is plugging firmly into the zeitgeist of 2007, a time when hybrid cars are desirable and Al Gore’s climate-change documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” won two Oscars.

As debate over the scope of global warming continues, local officials across the country have crafted their own policies. Austin, Texas, has a “Climate Protection Plan” that aims to make city buildings reliant on renewable energy by 2012. Portland, Ore., has an Office of Sustainable Development to encourage the use of everything from “green building,” the practice of increasing the efficiency with which buildings use and harvest energy, water and materials, to biofuels.

Last month, the Woodstock town board approved a nonbinding resolution that called for “implementing policies resulting in no net emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases” by 2017.

“Net” means residents can keep their cars as long as they produce enough clean power to offset their emissions.

The resolution lists ways to reach the zero carbon goal, including green building, bike paths, tree planting and biodiesel municipal fleets.

It’s the sort of bit-by-bit approach advocated by environmentalists. For instance, one person driving 2,000 fewer miles prevents about a ton of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere. And a compact fluorescent bulb will keep half a ton of carbon dioxide out of the air over its lifetime, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The savings are a wisp compared with the billions of tons of greenhouse gases released annually, but the idea is to reach meaningful reductions through collective action.

Mr. Horner said consumer efficiencies should be coupled with on-site generation such as solar power. Geothermal heating and cooling systems would take a bite out the town’s appetite for fossil fuel, he said.

Renewable-energy specialists say the goal is technically possible but difficult. Michael Armstrong, a policy analyst with Portland’s Office of Sustainability, called net zero a “monstrous challenge.”

But Mr. Horner insists that as fossil fuel prices spike during the next decade, alternative energy will become more attractive to both producers and residential consumers. Solar panels and geothermal systems will make more sense economically, he said.

Woodstock has some advantages that big cities such as Portland or Austin don’t. It’s a rural town with no heavy industry, and residents generally tend to be more sympathetic to save-the-planet ideas.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide