- The Washington Times - Thursday, April 26, 2007

1:08 p.m.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said today that conditions in Iraq may get harder before they get easier and will require “an enormous commitment” over time by the United States.

Speaking as the Senate debated veto-threatened legislation to start bringing home U.S. forces in October, Gen. Petraeus called the war in Iraq “the most complex and challenging I have ever seen.”

The four-star general, named by President Bush to oversee the recent buildup of American forces, cited some progress in the two months since the troop increase began. Still, he said, “there is vastly more work to be done across the board. … We are just getting started with the new effort.”

Gen. Petraeus avoided commenting directly on the legislation before the Senate, which passed the House last night. “I have tried to stay clear of the political minefields of various legislative proposals,” he said.

However, his comments made it clear that his war plan did not include a significant reduction of U.S. forces anytime soon.

“This effort may get harder before it gets easier,” Gen. Petraeus told reporters at a Pentagon briefing, depicting the situation as “exceedingly complex and very tough.”

He said that the increasing use of roadside bombs and suicide attacks, plus the greater concentration of U.S. troops among the population, has “led to greater U.S. losses” as well as increased Iraqi military casualties.

Asked how many troops he thought would have to remain in Iraq — and for how long — to finish the job, Gen. Petraeus said, “I wouldn’t try to truly anticipate what level might be some years down the road.” However, he noted historical precedents to long U.S. peacekeeping missions.

“It is an endeavor that clearly is going to require enormous commitment and commitment over time, but beyond that time I don’t want to get into try[ing] to postulate how many brigades or when we would start to do something,” he said.

Gen. Petraeus said matters were made worse by “exceedingly unhelpful activities by Iran and Syria, especially those by Iran.”

He said it was hard to say whether senior officials in the Iranian government were sanctioning sending weapons and technology to insurgents in Iraq.

“We do not have a direct link of Iranian involvement” in attacks, Gen. Petraeus said.

He also said that, while the fledgling Iraqi government is often billed as a unity government among Shi’ites, Sunnis and Kurds, it actually is not.

“It is not a government of national unity. Rather, it is one comprised of political leaders from different parties that often default to narrow agendas and a zero-sum approach to legislation,” the general said.

He said that was one reason why progress has been so slow on deciding how to divide up oil revenues and pass budget and emergency powers laws.

Despite the disappointing pace, Gen. Petraeus said he thinks Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and other leaders “are committed to achieving more in this area in the months ahead.”

Gen. Petraeus cited slowly improving conditions in turbulent Anbar province in western Iraq, noting that it had been “assessed as lost six months ago.”

He said the increased U.S. presence in various outposts has enabled Iraqis “to stitch together the fabric of society that was so torn.”

But Gen. Petraeus said improvements, such as the reopening of shops and the return by some residents to their homes, are “often eclipsed by sensational attacks that overshadow our daily accomplishments.”

“Iraq is, in fact, the central front of al Qaeda’s global campaign,” he said. “Al Qaeda-Iraq remains a formidable foe with considerable resilience and a capability to produce horrific attacks.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide