- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 20, 2007

12:17 p.m.

SYDNEY, Australia — The Australian government today announced plans to phase out incandescent light bulbs and replace them across the country with more energy-efficient compact fluorescent bulbs.

Legislation to gradually restrict the sale of the old-style bulbs could reduce Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million tons by 2012 and cut household power bills by up to 66 percent, said Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Australia produced almost 565 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2004, official figures show.

Prime Minister John Howard said the plan would help all Australians play a part in cutting harmful gas emissions: “Here’s something practical that everybody will participate in,” he said.

In incandescent light bulbs, perfected for mass use by Thomas A. Edison in the late 19th century, electricity flows through a filament to create light. Much of the energy, however, is wasted in the form of heat.

Australia is not the only place looking to replace such bulbs with fluorescent lighting, which is more efficient and lasts longer.

Last month, a California assemblyman announced he would propose a bill to ban the use of incandescent bulbs in his state. A New Jersey lawmaker has called for the state to switch to fluorescent lighting in government buildings within three years.

Cuba’s Fidel Castro began a similar program two years ago, sending youth brigades into homes and switching out regular bulbs for energy-saving ones to help battle electrical blackouts around the island.

Under the Australian plan, bulbs that do not comply with energy-efficiency targets would be banned gradually from sale. Exemptions may apply for special needs, such as medical lighting and oven lights.

Fluorescent bulbs are more expensive than incandescent bulbs, but they use about 20 percent of the power to produce the same amount of light, and they last longer, making them more competitive over time, advocates argue.

Environmentalists welcomed the light-bulb plan but noted that the vast bulk of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions come from industry, such as coal-fired power stations.

“It is a good, positive step, but it is a very small step. It needs to be followed through with a lot of different measures,” Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Josh Meadows told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide