- The Washington Times - Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Samuel R. Berger’s theft of documents from the National Archives compromised national security “much more than originally disclosed” and resulted in “incomplete and misleading” information being given to the September 11 commission, says the former chairman of the House Government Reform Committee.

“It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience,” Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, Virginia Republican, said yesterday.

“No one ever told the commission Mr. Berger had access to original documents he could have taken without detection.”

In October, Mr. Davis led an effort by House Republicans to investigate and hold hearings on which documents might have been “destroyed, removed or were missing” after visits to the National Archives by Mr. Berger, President Clinton’s national security adviser from 1997 to 2001.

Mr. Davis said the investigation found that the full extent of Mr. Berger’s document removal can never be known and, consequently, the Justice Department could not assure the September 11 commission — which was investigating intelligence and security failures — it received all the documents to which Mr. Berger had access.

“We now know Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection,” he said. “We know Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole.”

Mr. Davis noted that during three visits to the Archives, Mr. Berger was given access to working papers of National Security Council staff members, including Mr. Berger, and their content was not inventoried by the Archives at the document level. He said Mr. Berger focused solely on original documents during his first two visits and there was “no way to determine” whether he “swiped any of these original documents.”

The National Archives Office of Inspector General reported last month that Mr. Berger hid documents under a construction trailer where they could be retrieved later.

Lanny Breuer, Mr. Berger’s attorney, said the matter was thoroughly investigated by the Justice Department for more than two years and effectively closed for more than a year. He said the report’s conclusions were based on “pure conjecture.”

“Not a single fact is offered to support them,” Mr. Breuer said.

“Sandy Berger made a mistake. But he has admitted that mistake, fully cooperated with the government’s investigation, paid his debt to society, and moved on. It’s time for the new congressional minority to do the same.”

Mr. Davis described the Justice Department’s assertion that Mr. Berger’s statements were credible after being caught as “misplaced.” He said, “One wouldn’t rely on the fox to be truthful after being nabbed in the henhouse. But the Justice Department apparently did.”

Justice Department spokesman Bryan Sierra said the department “has no evidence that Sandy Berger’s actions deprived the 9/11 commission of documents, and we stand by our investigation of this matter.”

Mr. Berger pleaded guilty in April 2005 to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material, including documents outlining the government’s knowledge of terrorist threats to the United States.

He was fined $50,000 and barred from access to classified material for three years. He had faced a year in prison and a $100,000 fine, but a plea agreement with the Justice Department reduced the fine and kept him out of prison.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide