- The Washington Times - Thursday, July 5, 2007


OK. I’m glad President Bush commuted the 30-month prison sentence of Scooter Libby, the former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Like Mr. Bush, I buy the jury’s verdict that Libby committed perjury and obstructed justice in a Justice Department probe to discover who leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson. Perjury is no small crime and Libby could have spared himself a long legal ordeal if only he had not lied to investigators. Libby made his own bed.

That said, Libby’s prosecution has seemed overwrought and overly political from the beginning. Note that Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald never prosecuted Richard Armitage, who originally leaked the operative’s identity.

Mr. Bush split the judge’s sentence down the middle. He did not pardon Libby, but instead upheld the $250,000 fine and two years of probation. Mr. Bush reasoned that the fine, probation and prison time, however, were “excessive.”

As Mr. Bush noted in a written statement, in making the sentencing decision, the judge “rejected the advice of the probation office, which recommended a lesser sentence and the consideration of factors that could have led to a sentence of home confinement or probation.”

My complaint is that Mr. Bush did not commute other sentences of others to “excessive” time under the federal mandatory minimum sentencing laws.

About an hour after the news, Amy Ralston called me. Mrs. Ralston had been sentenced to 24 years for her role in her former husband’s reputed Ecstasy ring, until President Clinton commuted her sentence in July 2000.

“I only look at it one way,” Mrs. Ralston said. “I want to know if he granted additional pardons for other people who are serving 20-to-life for minor drug crimes. I know so many who have had their petitions denied by the Bush administration, who are deserving.” She was crying as she discussed friends left behind in prison, serving sentences far longer than their crimes warranted. (Her Web site is www.candoclemency.com.)

As long as Mr. Bush is looking at “excessive” sentences that cry out for a presidential fix, he should consider the sad case of Clarence Aaron. This man was 22 years old when he made the huge mistake of hooking up two drug dealers for two cocaine deals. He was paid $1,500 — but because he did not testify against the big fish in the deal and he pleaded not guilty, he was sentenced to life without parole. That’s right, life without parole — for a first-time nonviolent drug offense.

Aaron’s sentence is so “excessive” he will die behind bars unless a president shows him mercy. If Libby’s sentence is “excessive,” Aaron’s is obscene.

U.S. Border Patrol agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean are serving “excessive” prison sentences right now. The agents were convicted for shooting at a fleeing suspect smuggling 743 pounds of marijuana over the border in 2005, as well as for covering up the shooting and denying the smuggler his rights. Today, the smuggler is suing the federal government for $5 million, while Ramos and Compean serve 11- and 12-year prison sentences, respectively. These men dedicated their adult lives to public service. They deserve a commutation so they can return to wives and the children who need them.

“There are hundreds if not thousands of worthy clemency petitions awaiting the president’s decision — these prisoners don’t have the same White House connections as Scooter Libby, but they deserve the same serious consideration he received,” wrote Families Against Mandatory Minimums President Julie Stewart. “The president needs to grant these applicants to prove that clemency is available not just to the well-connected but to every deserving prisoner.”

“Independence Day is coming,” Amy Ralston noted. “And I think that would be the perfect time for President Bush to grant some more clemencies. I’ll be watching the fireworks this Fourth and hope some of the women I left behind will have that same privilege.”

Debra J. Saunders is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide