- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 3, 2007


The Justice Department’s former No. 2 official testified yesterday that he was unaware of plans to fire underperforming U.S. attorneys and praised all but one of the eight who were purged last year.

Jim Comey, who served as deputy attorney general from 2003 to 2005, said he had one 15-minute conversation during his tenure about prosecutors who were considered weak managers. Only one of the eight who ultimately were fired — Kevin Ryan, the former U.S. attorney in San Francisco — fit that description, Mr. Comey said.

The others were doing their jobs well, he told a House Judiciary subcommittee investigating the firings.

His testimony starkly contrasted with the Justice Department’s insistence that the eight were ordered to resign in a midterm purge because they were considered underperformers in some of the Bush administration’s priority crime-fighting areas.

David Iglesias of New Mexico, for example, was “a very effective U.S. attorney,” Mr. Comey said. He called Daniel Bogden of Nevada “as straight as a Nevada highway and a fired-up guy” and Paul Charlton of Arizona “one of the best.”

Of John McKay, former prosecutor in Seattle: “One of my favorites,” Mr. Comey said. Carol Lam of San Diego was “a fine U.S. attorney.”

He said he did not have much interaction with Bud Cummins of Little Rock, Ark., and neither he nor lawmakers spoke about Margaret Chiara, who was prosecutor in Grand Rapids, Mich.

The former deputy attorney general called Mr. Ryan “a fine guy — he just had management problems in that office.”

Mr. Comey, now counsel at defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp., said he did not know his Feb. 28, 2005, brief talk with Kyle Sampson, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales’ former chief of staff, was part of a larger process to weed out underperformers. The discussion occurred less than a month after Mr. Gonzales was confirmed.

“I was not aware there was any sort of process going on … or my brief conversation with Mr. Sampson was part of a process,” Mr. Comey said.

He also said he was unaware of any discussions about dismissing prosecutors for political reasons, as Democrats think happened. He said he never spoke with Karl Rove, President Bush’s chief political adviser, and that his discussions with former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers were limited to topics like presidential pardons.

Justice Department documents show both Mr. Rove and Mrs. Miers had floated the idea of firing all 93 U.S. attorneys shortly after the 2004 elections. Mr. Comey told lawmakers that proposal “would be very disruptive” if it had been carried out.

“We have an obligation to get to the bottom of this and to reassure the public that there is no wrongdoing, if in fact that is the case,” said Rep. Melvin Watt, North Carolina Democrat. “If it is not the case, it is our responsibility to expose that.”

Rep. Chris Cannon of Utah, the top Republican on the panel, praised Mr. Comey’s candor but chastised Democrats controlling the hearing of unfairly seeking to link the White House’s political operation to the firings. “So far this seems to be a fishing expedition that’s come up dry,” Mr. Cannon said.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide