- The Washington Times - Thursday, October 18, 2007

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Like a bad penny that keeps coming back, members of Congress are busy again trying to make Puerto Rico our 51st state. Rep. Jose Serrano, New York Democrat, has introduced H.R. 900, the Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2007.

If Congress passes it, Puerto Ricans would have to vote for the fourth time in 40 years on whether they want their island nation to remain a self-governing U.S. commonwealth or become a U.S. state. One can be forgiven for wondering why Puerto Ricans should have to go through this costly exercise again, since they have gone to the polls and rejected statehood three times before, the last occurring in 1998.

There are other reasons to question this bill. One is that its name, Puerto Rico “Democracy” Act, is misleading. Puerto Rico is already a democracy and it is wrong to suggest otherwise. Worse, the act itself is hardly “democratic.” It proposes a two-stage referendum process that is rigged in favor of statehood.

But by far the most important reason to oppose H.R. 900 is that it does not require Spanish-speaking Puerto Rico to adopt English as the language of its government before it is considered for statehood. Should Puerto Rico become the 51st state without adopting English, it is sure to open up a Pandora’s box of language-related evils.

Statehood supporters say such concerns are unwarranted because Puerto Rico has made both Spanish and English official languages. But even though most well-educated Puerto Ricans speak English, and English is widely taught in the public schools, the island’s four million residents are still overwhelmingly Spanish-speaking, according to the Census. And the default language of Puerto Rico’s day-to-day government operations is Spanish, not English.

Unless that changes and Puerto Rico agrees to conduct its government operations in English like all the other 50 states, admitting the Spanish-speaking island to the Union will have an immediate impact on this country. Puerto Rico is likely to demand that the federal government operate in both English and Spanish to accommodate its congressional representatives and its Spanish-speaking citizenry. That will give rise to speeches and debates in Spanish on the floors of Congress with simultaneous translation similar to what we now see at U.N. meetings.

The abrupt move toward Canadian-style bilingualism at the federal level will have a ripple affect throughout American society. It will send precisely the wrong message about the need to maintain our national unity in English at a time when the United States is already struggling to assimilate a large and rapidly growing Spanish-speaking immigrant population.

Politicians, always eager to broker interest-group privileges in return for political support, will compete with each other to pose as champions of relatively cheap language entitlements.

English-speaking Americans, including many immigrants alarmed at the rapid disintegration of their monolingual “melting pot,” will grow increasingly resentful and wonder when it was that they voted to become a bilingual society.

Meanwhile Spanish-dominant enclaves like South Florida and many other parts of the country, will grow larger and isolate an increasingly Spanish-speaking lower class. Over time these social tensions are sure to result in a growing Spanish-English divide and create the kind cultural-political fault lines that are fracturing the unity today of countries like Belgium, Canada and Ukraine. As sociologist Seymour Martin Lipset noted, “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.”

One way to avert a shipwreck over language would be for Congress to insist that Puerto Rico adopt English as the language of its government before it could be considered for statehood. Puerto Rican voters would also have to understand that adopting English is a requirement if they decide to vote for statehood.

There is a precedent for insisting that territories adopt English as a precondition for statehood. In 1811 President James Madison signed the Louisiana Enabling Act that required predominantly French- and Creole-speaking Louisiana to adopt English as the language of its government before it could be admitted to the Union.

But another solution would be for Congress to pass a constitutional amendment making English the sole official language of the U.S. government. Once ratified by the states, the amendment would end the argument, and with it any danger of a bilingual government.

It is clear that one way or another, the American people want to preserve our nation’s historic unity in the English language. If Congress reopens the issue of Puerto Rican statehood, it must confront the issue of language.

K.C. McAlpin is executive director of ProEnglish, a nonprofit organization which advocates for official English.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide