- The Washington Times - Wednesday, October 3, 2007

(AP) — Cheryll Witz was in the Costco store in Tucson, Ariz., shopping for a birthday cake when her cell phone rang.

Waiting to speak to her was one of the nation’s most notorious serial killers — the man who five years earlier had killed her father.

“I need to apologize for what I’ve done to you and your family,” Lee Boyd Malvo told her during the Sept. 20 call.

Miss Witz stood, stunned, in the shopping aisle.

“I was standing in the Costco bawling my eyes out,” she said.

In March 2002, Malvo fatally shot Miss Witz’s father, Jerry Taylor, as he practiced chip shots on a golf course practice green in Arizona. Mr. Taylor’s slaying was a precursor to the killing spree that terrorized the D.C. area seven months later.

That’s when the teenage Malvo and partner John Allen Muhammad killed 10 persons and wounded three others over a three-week span that began Oct. 2, 2002, with a shooting in Aspen Hill. The pair killed four persons in Montgomery County during a three-hour spree five years ago today and a fifth person that night in the District.

Malvo placed the call to Miss Witz through a third party. He had initially called a producer at ABC News, who then used three-way calling to connect Malvo to Miss Witz after she agreed to take the call.

Such calls violate prison policy, said Virginia Department of Corrections spokesman Larry Traylor. He would not comment, though, on Malvo’s specific phone calls or whether he has called any other victims’ relatives. A network spokesman said the producer did not know three-way calls were prohibited and would not have connected the two had she been aware.

At one point, Miss Witz said Malvo broke down as he spoke.

“The first thing he said was, ‘I tried to write a letter to you but I couldn’t. I didn’t know what to say,’ ” Miss Witz said.

Miss Witz has tried for years to learn more about the circumstances of her father’s death, and at one point even wrote to Malvo, urging him to divulge what he knew.

Unfortunately, some of the answers Malvo provided in the brief, five-minute call were far from comforting.

For personal reasons, Miss Witz did not want to discuss all the details of the call, particularly those surrounding the exact circumstances of her father’s death. But she said some of what Malvo said raised more questions in her mind about exactly what happened and why.

“I would like to know why they picked my father,” she said.

For several years after Mr. Taylor’s murder, Malvo was a suspect but the case remained open. Last year, after Miss Witz wrote to Malvo, he confessed his involvement to Tucson police, who now consider the matter closed.

Pima County prosecutors do not intend to prosecute Malvo or Muhammad.

Malvo already has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in Virginia and Maryland. The death penalty is not an option because the U.S. Supreme Court has barred the execution of juvenile criminals, and Malvo had just turned 17 when he shot Mr. Taylor.

Muhammad has been sentenced to death in Virginia and to life in prison in Maryland.

Miss Witz had thought Malvo’s confession might help her find closure, but instead it only raised more questions. Malvo told police that Mr. Taylor’s murder was part of a hired hit, at least according to the information Muhammad gave him.

Tucson police have rejected that motive, and Miss Witz said she can’t think of anybody who would have had a grudge against her father. But certain facts don’t fit. Malvo told Miss Witz, for instance, that Muhammad and Malvo had photos of Mr. Taylor before the pair ever arrived in Tucson. Miss Witz wonders where those pictures came from.

In transcripts of Malvo’s confession to Tucson police, Malvo said he asked where the pictures came from but was told by Muhammad that information was on “a need-to-know basis.” Tucson police last year said they followed up on some of what Malvo said in his confession but that it could not be corroborated.

Malvo’s attorney from his first trial, Craig Cooley, said Malvo may not be the best source for determining the real reasons behind the killings. Malvo only knew what Muhammad told him, and much of what Muhammad said was plainly ridiculous, Mr. Cooley said.

For instance, Malvo believed Muhammad when told that the $10 million ransom sought from the government to stop the sniper killings would be used to establish a Utopian society for 140 homeless children on a Canadian compound.

Carmeta Albarus-Lindo, a New York social worker appointed to work with Malvo during his legal process, said Malvo has freed himself from Muhammad’s psychological grip.

“He has evolved into a young man who really wants to make amends, who is truly remorseful,” she said.

Miss Witz’s feelings toward Malvo remain conflicted. She remains angry, but said it was important to her to hear his apology directly. She hopes Malvo will follow through on a promise he made during the call to write to her.

“I told him that I was glad he didn’t get the death penalty. I told him, ‘You need to think about what you’ve done,’ ” Miss Witz said. “He said, ‘The Lee then and Lee now are two different people.’ ”

n Associated Press writer Stephen Manning contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide