- The Washington Times - Monday, February 11, 2008

Divided party

“Give the media credit for getting the political story line right this election. Now if only they’d applied it to the correct party,” Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberley A. Strassel writes.

“Division, disunity, the potential end of an era — these were the watchwords for the GOP in 2008. The election was supposed to break the Republican Party, maybe even bring an end to the Reagan coalition,” the writer said.

Mitt Romney’s withdrawal [Thursday] instead ends a spirited GOP debate. John McCain faces a big challenge unifying and rallying his base, but his Super Tuesday wins show he’s making some progress. Mr. Romney’s gracious withdrawal, and the senator’s faultless address [Thursday] to the Conservative Political Action Conference, should help. It’s also notable that Mr. McCain’s support, such as it is, is coming from all three legs of that old Reagan stool — defense hawks, fiscal conservatives and values voters.

“The party with a meat cleaver down its middle is the Democrats. That was the takeaway of Tuesday’s exit polls, which magnified what have become yawning divisions. Hillary Clinton gets women; Barack Obama gets men. Mrs. Clinton gets Hispanics; Mr. Obama, blacks. Mrs. Clinton gets blue-collar workers; Mr. Obama higher-income voters. Mrs. Clinton gets older citizens; Mr. Obama younger ones. …

“This division is the Democrats’ new problem, bigger than (and exacerbated by) the prospect of a long primary fight. They are waging a war on personality, identity and party — an ugly battle that is splitting voters into emotional or identity camps. Party leaders are now privately worrying that the ultimate nominee will not be able to heal the breaches.”

Hillary’s strength

“Republicans and Barack Obama are far apart ideologically, but they have a common enemy: Hillary Clinton. This explains why many Republicans look kindly on Obama’s bid for the Democratic presidential nomination,” Fred Barnes writes in the Weekly Standard.

“Republicans have two goals in the 2008 race. One is to retain the presidency. The other is to deny the Clintons — Hillary and Bill — another four (or eight) years in the White House,” Mr. Barnes said.

“Thwarting the Clintons won’t be easy. Hillary Clinton is nowhere near as close to losing the Democratic nomination as many in the political community believe. It’s true she doesn’t inspire. In debates, she constantly flashes a fake smile and, when unnerved, unleashes a contrived laugh — aka, the cackle. She attracts far smaller and considerably less enthusiastic crowds than Obama does. And his fundraising now dwarfs hers.

“But Clinton has already survived two crushing defeats, first in Iowa, then in South Carolina, only to rise again on Super Tuesday with a string of lopsided victories in blue states the Democratic nominee must carry in November. Obama did better in red states that are less important to Democrats in a general election.

“For all her unattractiveness as a candidate, Clinton has put together an impressive, and seemingly durable, coalition of women, seniors, Hispanics, and the less-than-wealthy. In the California primary last week, she lost the white vote to Obama by 49 percent to 43 percent, yet won the state in a near-landslide: 52 percent to 42 percent.”

Hillary’s weakness

“What if a presidential candidate held what she billed as ‘the largest, most interactive town hall in political history’ on national television, and no one noticed?” New York Times columnist Frank Rich writes.

“The untold story in the run-up to Super Tuesday was Hillary Clinton‘s elaborate live prime-time special the night before the vote. Presiding from a studio in New York, the candidate took questions from audiences in 21 other cities. She had plugged the event four days earlier in the last gasp of her debate with Barack Obama and paid a small fortune for it: an hour of time on the Hallmark Channel plus satellite TV hookups for the assemblies of supporters stretching from coast to coast,” Mr. Rich said.

“The same news media that constantly revisited the Oprah-Caroline-Maria rally in California ignored ‘Voices Across America: A National Town Hall.’ The Clinton campaign would no doubt attribute this to press bias, but it scrupulously designed the event to avoid making news. Like the scripted ‘Ask President Bush‘ sessions during the 2004 campaign, this town hall seemed to unfold in Stepford. The anodyne questions (‘What else would you do to help take care of our veterans?’) merely cued up laundry lists of talking points. Some in attendance appeared to trance out.

“But I’m glad I watched every minute, right up until Mrs. Clinton was abruptly cut off in midsentence so Hallmark could resume its previously scheduled programming (a movie promising ‘A Season for Miracles,’ aptly enough). However boring, this show was a dramatic encapsulation of how a once-invincible candidate ended up in a dead heat, crippled by poll-tested corporate packaging that markets her as a synthetic product leeched of most human qualities. What’s more, it offered a naked preview of how nastily the Clintons will fight, whatever the collateral damage to the Democratic Party, in the endgame to come.”

In the fall

Sen. John McCain is popular with the press, but at least one former network newsman predicts that will change when it comes time for the general election, the Media Research Center’s Brent Baker writes at www.mrc.org

“Noting presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain ‘gets good treatment’ from journalists, former CBS News correspondent Bernard Goldberg predicted on Thursday’s ‘O’Reilly Factor’ that since the ‘media like him because he’s the one who pokes his thumb in Republican and conservative eyes, mostly conservative eyes,’ that’s ‘going to end’ and so ‘as soon as it’s McCain against Obama or Clinton the media goes over to the other side.’ ”

Another victory

Sen. Barack Obama topped a Clinton in another contest yesterday — the Grammys.

The presidential candidate beat former Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter to win best spoken-word album for his audio version of his book “The Audacity Of Hope: Thoughts On Reclaiming The American Dream,” the Associated Press reports.

Mr. Clinton was nominated for his book “Giving: How Each of Us Can Change the World” and Mr. Carter for “Sunday Mornings in Plains: Bringing Peace to a Changing World.” Also nominated were Maya Angelou and Alan Alda.

Greg Pierce can be reached at 202/636-3285 or gpierce@washingtontimes .com.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide