- The Washington Times - Monday, February 11, 2008


Charlie Plosser, president of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank, warned last week about the risks of inflation, overly aggressive interest-rate cuts and further damage to the Fed’s credibility. I share Mr. Plosser’s concerns.

I say this as a supporter of the “shock and awe” Fed policies that brought the fed funds target rate down from 51/4 percent to its present 3 percent. These aggressive actions were necessary, and they’ve paid off. The target rate is now properly below the 10-year bond yield, while the Treasury curve is upward sloping for the first time in nearly 20 months. The overly tight money period of 2006-07 has finally come to an end. And even though in its aftermath the economy could skip into mild recession, this is a positive, watershed event.

Most economists ignore the fact that the subprime credit crisis, along with the extraordinary downturn in housing construction and home prices, is largely the result of the Fed’s massive tightening move that lifted the funds rate above 5 percent in the first place.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke inherited this bucket of smelly molasses from his predecessor, Alan Greenspan. In straightening out the situation, Mr. Bernanke has opened the door to a rapid economic recovery. It’s a signal achievement for the former Princeton professor.

Mr. Bernanke has taken a lot of criticism in the last year, and I think much of it is undeserved. Wall Street claims he’s an isolated academic, unaware of the real-world difficulties of sagging capital markets, slumping stock prices and slowing growth. But he moved aggressively once he saw the credit problem develop last summer. And new information obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveals how he has been meeting with leaders in business, finance and government all along.

He has talked with John Chambers, the chief executive officer of Cisco Systems, Sam Palmisano, the head of IBM, JPMorgan chief Jamie Dimon, former Senate banking head Phil Gramm, and international central bankers Jean Claude Trichet and Mervyn King. The Street was wrong about Mr. Bernanke. He has been on top of the situation. He took remedial action, and the economy will be the beneficiary faster than people think.

But here’s his next challenge. Mr. Bernanke needs to end the stop-and-go policies he inherited from his predecessor. Mr. Greenspan became a supreme monetary tinkerer in his final years, putting the Fed’s interest rate and monetary levers in constant overdrive. Go. Stop. Go. Stop.

This Keynesian central planning has damaged the Fed’s credibility. It has weakened the dollar. Entrepreneurs and investors can’t possibly plan ahead when interest rates bob up and down like yo-yos.

I suspect Charlie Prosser was referring to all this when he talked about the Fed’s credibility last week. If so, he’s right. So let’s say goodbye to Fed tinkering once and for all, and say hello to permanent enhancements to the economy’s incentive structure.

How about lowering tax rates on corporations? How about lowering the corporate capital-gains tax rate? Why not abolish the individual capital-gains tax? Or the dividend tax? Or the estate tax? Why not eliminate the multiple-taxation of savings and investment?

At some point, the entire corporate tax structure should be thrown out, along with all the murky K-Street tax-earmark loopholes that litter the Internal Revenue Code. We need to broaden the tax base and lower marginal rates. This is the key to maximizing future economic growth on the supply side. Without strong tax-reform measures to expand the production of goods and services, further Fed money injections are only demand-side “solutions” that will surely inflate prices and depreciate the currency.

Back in the 1970s, Washington policymakers were obsessed with increasing aggregate demand, but they forgot about aggregate supply. Today’s short-term-stimulus rebate package is a throwback to that era. It’s not economic stimulus, it’s political stimulus. Members of Congress up for re-election are trying to “do something” in response to primary-season exit polls that say Americans are totally unhappy with the economy.

But these rebates are budget busters. And how will Congress attempt to pay down $400 billion in budget deficits? Higher tax rates, of course. And then we’ll really be back in the 1970s.

Out on the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has a Nixonian idea to freeze interest rates on subprime mortgages. Exactly wrong. Doing so would cause financial havoc at home and abroad. Perhaps Mr. McCain, who is now campaigning as an heir to Ronald Reagan, will argue for a strong, pro-growth tax reform to expand the economy and a steady monetary policy to protect the dollar and reinforce domestic price stability. One can only hope.

But if Mr. Bernanke can officially put the yo-yo interest-rate days behind us, we’re halfway there.

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company” and is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide