- The Washington Times - Tuesday, June 10, 2008

The office of Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday lashed out at advocacy groups complaining that he is choosing the next U.N. human rights advocate in secret.

“The idea, circulated by some, that the process represents some sort of cozy inside deal is absurd, even offensive,” said spokeswoman Marie Okabe, reading a hastily drafted statement from Mr. Ban’s office.

“The United Nations has consulted widely with every group and constituency represented at the United Nations, including member states, non-governmental organizations and human rights groups.”

The current high commissioner for human rights, Louise Arbour of Canada, is stepping down when her four-year term expires at the end of June.

Mr. Ban sent a letter to member states at the end of March soliciting their candidates for the post, one of the most delicate in the whole U.N. system.

Ban’s letter (PDF)

Mr. Ban’s office has refused to release the names of those serving on the search committee to select the next high commissioner for human rights, prompting one online advocacy organization to post a fake help-wanted ad in this week’s Economist “Executive Focus” section in protest.

UN officials say the secrecy is important to “protect” the decision-makers from political pressures.

Previous secretaries general have rarely had such qualms.

Several non-government organizations that deal regularly in civil liberties and political rights say that tehy cannot trust a selection process they do not understand.

Diplomats, some of whom claim to have seen a short list, are of several minds. Some say they trust Mr. Ban select Ms. Arbour’s successor, as that is part of the secretary general’s job. Others say they wish they were consulted earlier in the process.

“At some point, I believe member states should be consulted so that they can have input, a chance to influce the the decision,” U.N. General Assembly President Srgjan Kerim, CORRECT who has not been included in the process, told the Washington Times. “Often there are consultations, informal consultations, especially on these very delicate issues.”

Either way, Mr. Ban’s office is determined not to make a short list of contenders public — as many demand — saying that Ms. Arbour’s competitors were not named.

Ms. Okabe acknowledged the short listed candidates would be interviewed by Mr. Ban, “this is for obvious reasons of privacy and is not about alleged transparency issues,” she told reporters.

Mr. Ban’s office did not return calls seeking comment.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide