- The Washington Times - Wednesday, May 21, 2008


Profits from government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — not taxpayers — would back up a home loan rescues for struggling borrowers under a plan approved by a key Senate committee yesterday.

Democrats and Republicans banded together to push the plan through the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee on a 19-2 vote, boosting the chances for a broad election-year housing aid package.

The centerpiece of the measure would give cheaper, government-backed mortgages to as many as 500,000 strapped borrowers. Eight Republicans joined the panel’s Democrats to back the bill after extracting a major concession to pay for the foreclosure-prevention plan by diverting money intended to pay for housing for the poor.

The bill also tightens the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which would finance a new affordable housing fund that would temporarily be used to pay for the foreclosure prevention program.

“If I were writing this on my own, it would look different, but it is a balance,” said Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, chairman of the banking panel, who predicted the measure could clear Congress by July 4. “This is a major step forward,” he said.

Sen. Richard C. Shelby, the panel’s senior Republican, said: “I believe the White House will support this. I don’t know why they wouldn’t.”

The White House, however, called that assessment premature.

Officials have warned that President Bush would veto a similar House-passed measure, calling it a burdensome bailout that exposes taxpayers to undue risk. The bill would let the Federal Housing Administration back up to $300 billion in new loans for struggling homeowners who would otherwise be considered too financially risky to refinance into a fixed-rate, government-insured mortgage.

Borrowers would have to show they could afford the new loans, and to share with the government half of their new equity and any future proceeds from selling or refinancing. Mortgage holders would have to write down the existing loans at a substantial loss, in exchange for avoiding a costly foreclosure.

The White House was noncommittal yesterday about the Senate bill, saying policy aides were analyzing the financing mechanism to see whether it addressed Mr. Bush’s objections.

“That’s what we’re checking, because we don’t believe that taxpayer dollars should be used to help lenders or speculators. We think that we should be able to help Americans who want to stay in their homes and can afford to stay in their homes find a way to do that without using taxpayer dollars,” said Dana Perino, White House press secretary.

Of Mr. Shelby, Mrs. Perino said, “Maybe he’s an optimistic fella and he’s trying to push it along. I don’t have any reason to think that he has independent assurances from anybody that the president will sign the bill.”

The housing package is far from final. The Senate won’t act on the measure until after lawmakers return from a weeklong Memorial Day break, and even after that, the bill would have to make it through a contentious and complicated round of House-Senate negotiations before it could be presented to Mr. Bush.

Ultimately, it is expected to include the FHA homeowner rescue, a modernization of the FHA, a regulatory overhaul of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a package of housing tax breaks, including tax-free mortgage revenue bonds to help homeowners refinance subprime loans.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide