- The Washington Times - Thursday, October 9, 2008




The number of Republican Red states where Barack Obama leads is growing, reducing the states in play and thus cutting into electoral votes needed for a John McCain win in November.

As of this week, the freshman liberal senator led or held the edge in Iowa, Ohio, Florida, Nevada, Virginia, North Carolina, New Mexico and Colorado - eight states that can deliver 111 electoral votes to the winner.

President Bush previously won all these states along with a bunch of others that gave him 286 electoral votes to John Kerry’s 251. Mr. McCain can’t afford to lose any of these Red states, unless he can offset his losses by picking off a number of Democratic Blue states and that seems rather problematic right now (though polls show the race tightening in Minnesota and Wisconsin).

But with a little more than four weeks remaining in the presidential race in a brutal economic environment, the grim reality facing Mr. McCain is that his rival leads in more than a half-dozen Red states, while he cannot point to a single Blue state where he is ahead.

That is the predicament in which he now finds himself as Republican strategists grow increasingly pessimistic about his chances against the Obama juggernaut propelled by a national mood of economic gloom.

For months, Mr. Obama has been leading in several Red states that have been trending Democratic, but the Arizona Republican has been able to hold the edge in other must-win battlegrounds like Florida and Ohio. Now even these economically distressed states appear to be leaning toward the Democratic column along with several others as undecided voters begin making up their minds in Mr. Obama’s favor in the heat of an economy teetering toward recession.

Fearing Mr. McCain is fast running out of time to structurally change the election’s focus, Republican strategists say his only hope now is to make his rival’s judgment, inexperience and tax increases the central issues in the remaining weeks.

“McCain has got to make the campaign about Barack Obama. He’s got to say that with everything going on in the world, my opponent hasn’t completed a full term in office other than in the Illinois state legislature - that he is not ready to lead, that he is a risk that Americans cannot afford to take,” said Republican campaign adviser John Brabender.

The contrast between the two candidates on experience alone is stark. Barack Obama has been a U.S. senator for about three-and-a-half years, during most of which time he has been on the campaign trail.

He has in that time held no oversight hearings, even though he chairs a subcommittee, led no legislative battles and led no efforts to work across the aisle in behalf of the “new kind of politics” he has made the mantra of his campaign.

Instead, he rides a populist wave of economic pessimism and panic that appears ready to buy his “change you can believe in” mantra, despite an economic plan few voters understand.

At that plan’s core is a raft of draconian tax increases on critical components of the nation’s economy - tax increases that have been an integral part of his party’s “grow the government” prescriptions for decades.

Mr. Obama intends to raise the top personal income tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, raise the 15 percent tax rate on capital gains and dividends to between 20 percent and 28 percent, levy higher tax rates on corporations, and increase the Social Security payroll tax on upper-income Americans.

Mr. Obama will be raising taxes on the very parts of our economy that have been the wellspring of its venture capital investment pool that is now on life support.

Exactly how Americans worried about the economy can truly believe we can tax our way out of a recession is a mystery, but that is what Mr. Obama is peddling and that is what Mr. Obama voters are buying hook, line and sinker.

But not everyone. Listen to what University of Maryland economist Peter Morici, a sharp critic of the Bush administration’s economic policies, says about Mr. Obama’s plan: “Obama’s tax and redistribute policies will not resurrect jobs, wages or the price of stocks in American retirement accounts. … Obama’s policies may make economic conditions worse,” he said this week. “His platform is full of platitudes and generalizations but not enough substance.”

Mr. McCain must relentlessly pound Mr. Obama’s tax plan as the medical equivalent of bleeding an economy that is hemorrhaging internally. The American economy is not ill because it is undertaxed. U.S. corporations are taxed at one of the highest rates of the world’s industrialized nations, second only to Japan.

This issue still resonates with Americans if it is explained clearly and powerfully, but it must be tied to Mr. Obama’s inexperience and his irrational class warfare hostility toward corporations and wealth.

Barack Obama thinks raising taxes to enrich government is the answer to all our troubles when it will only weaken a severely anemic, overtaxed economy desperately in need of capital and tax relief.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide