- The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 15, 2009

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) | New York Gov. David A. Paterson plans to introduce legislation this week to legalize same-sex marriage, reviving a bill that died in 2007 and still faces strong opposition despite a new Democratic majority in the state Senate.

Mr. Paterson, talking to reporters Tuesday in Hempstead, N.Y., said “there is clearly a problem” when gays in civil unions are denied 1,200 to 1,350 civil protections, such as health care and pension rights because they're not married.

“The timing was always right. It's just who is willing to take that step, and I am,” Mr. Paterson said. “I think it is, as other states are showing, the only ethical way to treat people who want to live together in peace under the civil law. So my general feeling about all these issues is the right ethical decision will inevitably be the right political decision.”

In radio interviews last week, Mr. Paterson said he thinks it will eventually become law. But polls show that gay marriage remains controversial in New York, and some gay-marriage advocates are worried that bringing the issue up before there is clear support to pass it could set back efforts to legalize it there, as well as in other states.

Assemblyman Daniel O'Donnell, Manhattan Democrat, said he would attend Thursday's announcement and sponsor the governor's bill, which would be identical to the one backed by then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer when it passed the Assembly 85-61 two years ago.

“I'm hoping to do better than that this time,” Mr. O'Donnell said Tuesday. “When we got the bill from Governor Spitzer in 2007, we didn't have the votes either. I did that in 2007, and I intend to do that again in 2009.”

The Democrat-controlled Assembly passed the bill with three Republicans voting in favor, as well as some Democrats who faced criticism in their upstate districts for their support. It died in the Senate, where the Republican majority kept it from going to a vote.

Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith supports the measure but still doesn't believe there are enough votes to pass it, spokesman Austin Shafran said. The Democrats have a 32-30 majority.

“Most significantly, an issue of this importance demands more than a symbolic gesture and empty rhetoric,” Mr. Shafran said, acknowledging that the Senate doesn't have to act on a bill just because it was introduced. “We are committed to the process of securing the votes for passage of marriage equality, and as the leader has said in the past, it will pass as soon as we have those votes.”

Mark Hansen, spokesman for the Senate Republicans, said Tuesday that, “Our conference is opposed to gay marriage and that has not changed.”

“I think this is an attempt to gain momentum,” said the Rev. Jason McGuire, legislative director of New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, which opposes the measure. “But the simple reality is this is a very controversial issue, especially with this talk about the Senate majority being as razor thin as it is.”

“The arm twisting's going to begin,” said Mr. McGuire, who said he thinks at least three Democrats are now against it.

A Quinnipiac University poll last week showed that 41 percent of New York voters support same-sex marriage, up from 35 percent almost two years earlier, while one-third said gay couples should be allowed to form civil unions but not marry, and 19 percent said there should be no legal recognition.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide