- The Washington Times - Sunday, April 26, 2009

At times during our history, international events have provided starring roles for American presidents. President Theodore Roosevelt received the Nobel Peace Prize for negotiating an end to the Russo-Japanese War. President Kennedy’s pledge of solidarity, “Ich bin ein Berliner,” offered hope to captive people behind the Iron Curtain. President Nixon’s “secret” trip to Beijing precipitated still-ongoing changes in the People’s Republic of China. President Reagan’s tough diplomacy - and his decision to rebuild America’s defenses - turned the tide of the Cold War and hastened the end of an aptly named evil empire.

Then there are world events that consumed presidencies and doomed them to failure. President Wilson’s ill-informed dream of preventing all wars through the League of Nations became a nightmare. President Johnson’s hope of being remembered as a civil rights reformer died with his disastrous decisions on the battlefields of Vietnam. President Carter’s naked quest for a “peacemaker’s legacy” always will bear the miserable taint of his bungling during the Iranian hostage crisis. Now, with fewer than 100 days in office, President Obama already seems destined for this latter category.

The opening months of the Obama administration’s foreign policy have been marked by stunning naivete, serious missteps and ideological blindness to hard realities in an increasingly dangerous world. It is an open question whether he and his national security team can recover.

Just days after becoming commander in chief, Mr. Obama acquiesced in Beijing’s demands that U.S. vessels cease surveys within Chinese territorial waters. Russia rebuffed his “hand of friendship” and bribed Tajikistan into closing a U.S. base crucial to operations in Afghanistan. Pakistan replied to his “mutual respect for Islam” by allowing the world’s most notorious nuclear-weapons proliferator, Abdul Qadeer Khan, to return to business as usual. The Iranians sized up his offer for direct negotiations on nuclear weapons by turning on more centrifuges and locking up an American journalist. His “apologize for America first” tour of Europe brought cheers but no new commitments from NATO for help in Afghanistan. He was applauded for promising to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, but then he learned no one else would take the terrorists housed there.

Mr. Obama’s release of top-secret Bush administration documents on interrogation techniques - and his botched determination on whether to hold show trials for those who authorized such efforts to prevent further terror attacks - shocked allied intelligence services. His performance at the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad brought accolades from the mainstream media, but it disheartened those in Cuban, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan and Bolivian prisons who have committed no crimes except to speak out against their governments.

In Trinidad, Mr. Obama sat quietly - and, apparently, attentively - through a mind-numbing anti-American rant by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega during which the Sandinista leader accused the United States of heinous crimes. When asked his opinion afterward, Mr. Obama replied, “It was 50 minutes long.” No rebuttal. No defense of America or his predecessors’ efforts to offer others the hope of freedom.

When Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez gave him a homework assignment - to read the virulently anti-American screed “Open Veins of Latin America” - Mr. Obama accepted it with a smile for the cameras. Perhaps we should be grateful he didn’t bow to Mr. Chavez, as he did to Saudi King Abdullah.

Rep. Mike Pence, Indiana Republican and a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, described the Obama-Chavez photographs as “an enormous propaganda victory for the Socialist dictator.” They also were another stab in the back to former President George W. Bush, whom Mr. Chavez once called “the devil” in the U.N. General Assembly.

The Obama administration’s penitent foreign policy is evident in its approach to the United Nations and the International Criminal Court, which is a U.N. body hostile to American service members - the same ones the Obama administration describes as “disgruntled military veterans.” America’s new willingness to be pilloried publicly was apparent in Geneva last week at the United Nations’ Durban Review Conference on racism.

There the “star performer” was Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with whom Mr. Obama wants to sit down and parley about nuclear weapons. Mr. Ahmadinejad’s text accused the United States of “military aggression to make an entire nation homeless on the pretext of Jewish sufferings and the ambiguous and dubious question of Holocaust.” His diatribe depicted America’s closest ally in the Middle East as a nation of “racist perpetrators of genocide,” and he said, “It is time the ideal of Zionism, which is the paragon of racism, be broken.”

Though the U.S. delegation rightly did not attend this virulently anti-American, anti-Israeli bashing session, it is regrettable that the Obama administration has yet to object formally to the language or the “findings” of this U.N. conference. The deafening silence from the White House undoubtedly makes Mr. Ahmadinejad eager to get those nuclear negotiations on Mr. Obama’s calendar of coming events.

Oliver North is the host of “War Stories” on Fox News Channel and the author of “American Heroes.” Thomas Kilgannon is president of Freedom Alliance and covered the U.N.’s Durban Review Conference in Geneva for Radio America.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide