- The Washington Times - Monday, January 19, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

OP-ED:

The expected criticisms of Barack Obama’s choice of Leon Panetta as the next CIA director, emphasizing his lack of any CIA experience, ignored the Jan. 5 New York Times front-page story next to his selection. One of many such reports, it was about a Pakistani, now released after having been “rendered” (abducted) by the CIA, tortured, and then held at Guantanamo for five years without having been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime. Leon Panetta had nothing to do with that.

Critics of President-elect Barack Obama’s choice charge that Mr. Panetta has had no direct experience with the CIA or other intelligence work. Actually, as Fred Kaplan reveals in Slate (Jan. 6), while Mr. Panetta was President Clinton’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget, “he was one of a very few people who knew about all of the covert and special-access programs” and he knows where to find the buried line-item budget items concerning the CIA.

As for Mr. Panetta’s patriotic and moral qualifications for his new office, he wrote last year in Washington Monthly: “Those who support torture [the CIA’s involvement in torture has been extensively documented] may believe that we can abuse captives in certain select circumstances and still be true to our values. We either believe in…the rule of law…or we don’t. There is no middle ground.” Mr. Panetta added: “The Constitution was drafted by those who looked around the world of the eighteenth century and saw persecution, torture, and other crimes against humanity and believed that America could be better than that.” President Bush and Vice President Cheney have deeply shaken the world’s - including our allies’ - belief that we are indeed different.

The president-elect made another equally vital appointment that introduces the CIA to our Constitution. Beginning in 2002, it was at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel which advises the president, the attorney general and others in the executive branch on constitutional matters that torture became U.S. policy, and other violations of international treaties, and our own laws against cruel and inhumane punishments, were also legitimized.

In the Obama administration, the head of the Office of Legal Counsel will be Dawn Johnsen, University of Indiana constitutional law professor, who previously served there under Mr. Clinton. She is convinced, like Mr. Panetta, that we can and will overcome terrorists by refusing to resemble them in any way.

Before I continue in the next column to indicate the possible impact of these two appointments in markedly improving our intelligence services, here is a partial list of the specific war crimes in international law and our own statutes that have been committed during the past eight years, and before, by highly experienced CIA officials and their agents in the field.

Neither Mr. Panetta nor Mrs. Johnsen has committed any war crimes.

In Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, which the United States signed and has made part of our law, any person detained by our forces is guaranteed the right to freedom from “cruel treatment and torture; outrages on personal dignity (and) humiliating and degrading treatment.” These rights must be in effect whether the detainee is a prisoner of war, unprivileged belligerent or noncombatant. And, as I often tried to remind Mr. Cheney in my columns, the guarantees apply “in all circumstances” and “at any time and in any place whatsoever.” Moreover, the U.S. War Crimes Act of 1996 makes it a criminal offense for military personnel to commit the war crimes I have cited from the Geneva Conventions. That law was passed by a Republican-controlled Congress.

Also - and this should interest the new secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton - the indispensable 1,249-page, thoroughly documented “The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib” (Cambridge University Press) adds that our State Department Country Reports on Human Rights Practices “have expressly characterized as ‘torture’ or ‘other abuse’ tying detainees in painful positions; incommunicado detention; depriving detainees of sleep … long periods of imprisonment in darkened rooms … and instilling detainees with the false belief that they are about to be killed.” That’s waterboarding, Mr. Departing Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

These are also precisely the common practices of torture and other abuses during the Bush-Cheney administration in our own detention centers. We do not yet know the interrogation techniques that have been used in the CIA’s secret prisons. In view of Mr. Panetta’s and Mrs. Johnsen’s statements about the fundamental need to re-establish our rule of law for the CIA, I expect that they will insist on finding out and telling us what has been taking place in those “black sites.” Instead of aiding the enemy by disclosing these methods of interrogation specially authorized by President Bush, this sunlight will make Americans and the world believe we are indeed a government of laws, not of amoral apparatchiks.

As Mr. Panetta said last year in the Monterey County Herald, Mr. Bush “is using fear to trump the law.” Doing this is just plain un-American, and history will not absolve that administration.

Nat Hentoff’s column for The Washington Times appears on Mondays.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide