- The Washington Times - Monday, March 9, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

COMMENTARY:

Little by little, as the U.S. economy falls deeper into the recession, President Obama and his top White House staff are beginning to make political mistakes.

Last week, as the stock market plunged below the Dow’s 7,000 mark - losing 1,500 points since his Inauguration, Mr. Obama casually dismissed the sharp drop in equity values, comparing it to the ups and downs of a poll.

The stock market “is sort of like a tracking poll in politics,” he told news reporters Tuesday. “You know, it bobs up and down day to day. And if you spend all your time worrying about that, then you’re probably going to get the long-term strategy wrong.”

Excuse me? Tracking poll? The stock market represents the life savings and investments of millions of workers. More than 50 percent of American households, roughly 2 out of every 3 voters, own stock in the U.S. economy. We are talking about people’s retirement finances here that they see vanishing before their eyes, and millions of these investors are middle-class Americans struggling to make ends meet.



This is a time that called for a little sympathy about what this recession is doing to investors, a large group of people who did not draw much if any sympathy from Mr. Obama during his campaign for the presidency. “The stock market is the country right now. This is where people’s wealth is, this is their pension plans, their 401(k)s and IRAs,” CNBC’s investment guru Jim Cramer said last week.

But the president’s seemingly callous shoot from the hip response may have been the result of the political pressure he is coming under as the economy significantly worsens on his watch. Increasingly, critics blame the stock market’s plunge on his policies.

“There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that President Obama’s policy agenda is a factor in driving down the Dow,” economic policy strategist Cesar Conda wrote last week in his Politico blog. “The reason is simple: The threat of significantly higher tax rates on economic success, more government regulation and intrusion in the free market, and explosive increases in government spending and debt have all combined to reduce economic returns on equity investment,” he said.

Mr. Cramer, whose views on stocks are closely followed by millions of CNBC viewers, said he wanted “some sign that Obama realizes the market is totally falling apart. His agenda has a big hand in that happening.”

The other White House blunder came last week, too, when Mr. Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, took a shot at conservative radio talk show king Rush Limbaugh, saying he was the leader of the Republican Party. That triggered a GOP counterattack that took the White House to task for engaging in the kind of political blood sport that Mr. Obama had campaigned against, promising to change the tone in Washington.

The economy was going to hell in a handbasket and Mr. Obama’s chief of staff was playing no-holds-barred, Chicago-style politics. Cable television talk shows fueled the controversy and by midweek the White House was in full retreat as it realized its attacks had misfired and backfired. It was not a pretty picture.

A somewhat embarrassed presidential press secretary, Robert Gibbs, confessed that the low-road episode had been “counterproductive.”

But Republicans were gleefully ridiculing the White House’s failed attempt to tie the GOP to the hugely popular Mr. Limbaugh’s nuclear attacks on the president’s policies. “Now that the Obama administration has declared their own distractions, diversions and manipulations strategy to be counterproductive, House Republicans would like to see this administration join us in our bipartisan national conversation about job creation, stimulating small business and middle-class tax relief,” said Brad Dayspring, spokesman for House GOP Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia. “They should apologize to the American people for supporting these tactics and get back to work,” he said.

Meanwhile, the government was moving at its usual snail’s pace to get the administration’s stimulus money into the states, a slowness due largely to the dozens of critical deputy secretary posts that remain empty at Treasury and other key departments that have the job of dishing out the funds.

The economy is tanking and Wall Street still had little if any confidence that Mr. Obama’s spending stimulus would work since only a portion of its funds will be spent this year. And in Congress the Democrats were doing what they do best, spending more money, this time a massive omnibus fiscal 2009 bill containing 9,000 unrequested earmarked provisions that will needlessly cost taxpayers and the economy billions of hard-earned tax dollars.

The American people are willing to be patient for now, but we are by nature an impatient people and eventually that patience will start running out.

Correction: I inadvertently edited out a passage in my Monday, March 2, column that described President Obama’s remarks to Congress, making it appear he was referring to the omnibus spending bill when he was talking about his economic stimulus act.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide