- The Washington Times - Monday, November 23, 2009

Senate Democrats on Sunday sparred with each other over how to fix the nation’s troubled health care system, with moderates threatening to scuttle legislation if their demands weren’t met and the more liberal members warning their party leaders not to bend.

The dispute among Democrats presages a rowdy floor debate next month on legislation that would extend health care coverage to an estimated 31 million Americans. Republicans have already made clear they aren’t supporting the bill.

Final passage is in jeopardy, even after the chamber’s historic 60-39 vote Saturday night to begin debate.

“I don’t want a big-government, Washington-run operation that would undermine the … private insurance that 200 million Americans now have,” said Sen. Ben Nelson, Nebraska Democrat, considered a moderate.

Mr. Nelson and three other Democrats - Democratic Sens. Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Connecticut independent Joe Lieberman - agreed to open debate, despite expressing reservations on the measure. Each of them has warned that they might not support the final bill.

One major sticking point is a provision that would allow Americans to buy a federal-run insurance plan if their state allows it. Moderates say they worry the so-called public option will become a huge and costly entitlement program and that other requirements in the bill could cripple businesses.

“I don’t want to fix the problems in our health care system in a way that creates more of an economic crisis,” Mr. Lieberman said.

The sway held by such a small group of senators has annoyed their more liberal colleagues, who could vote against a final bill if it becomes too watered down.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, Ohio Democrat, said he didn’t think rank-and-file Democrats would feel compelled to go that far. At the same time, Mr. Brown warned Democratic leaders not to make too many concessions.

“I don’t want four Democratic senators dictating to the other 56 of us and to the rest of the country - when the public option has this much support - that [a public option is] not going to be in it,” Mr. Brown said.

The Senate bill would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide subsidies to those who couldn’t afford it. Large companies could incur costs if they did not provide coverage to their work force. The insurance industry would come under significant new regulation under the bill, which would first ease and then ban the practice of denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.

The House approved its version of the bill earlier this month on a near party-line vote of 220-215.

Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Nelson have said they object to the public option. On Sunday, Mr. Nelson said he was open to negotiating the provision, adding that he would prefer allowing states to opt into the program, instead of having to remove themselves.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said the lingering reservations by moderate Democrats indicate that the party’s leaders have gone too far. On Saturday, no Republican voted to begin debate on the bill, which they said would cripple industry and drive up costs for the average American.

“I believe there are a number of Democratic senators who do care what the American people think and are not interested in this sort of arrogant approach that ‘everybody sort of shut up and sit down, get out of the way, we know what’s best for you,’ ” Mr. McConnell said.

Mr. Brown and Mr. McConnell appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Mr. Lieberman appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Mr. Nelson appeared on ABC’s “This Week.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide