- The Washington Times - Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Maine voters will make history next month when they cast their ballots on whether to legalize same-sex marriage in the state — one way or another.

If they approve Question 1, the gay-marriage veto, it will mark the first time voters in a state have rejected a gay-marriage law that was approved by the legislature and signed by the governor. If the votes go against it, that will represent the first time a same-sex-marriage proposal has received the blessing of the voters.

Maine was catapulted into the center of the marriage debate in May when Democratic Gov. John Baldacci became the first governor to sign into law a gay-marriage bill. The law was scheduled to take effect in September, but foes of same-sex marriage countered by gathering enough signatures to place a so-called “people’s veto” onto the Nov. 3 ballot.

“For the first time, the citizens of a state have a chance to overthrow legislatively enacted same-sex marriage,” said Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriage.

A “yes” vote on Question 1 represents a vote in favor of the veto and thus against same-sex marriage.

So far, Mainers seemingly are split evenly. A Public Policy Polling survey released Oct. 20 found 48 percent in favor and 48 percent against Question 1. Analysts say that means the election is likely to hinge on voter turnout.

“The fate of Question 1 is going to be decided by which side does a better job of mobilizing their supporters to get out and vote,” said Dean Debnam, the polling firm’s president. “Voters in the state know where they stand on the issue, and now it’s just an issue of who shows up.”

Both sides like their chances. Supporters of Question 1 draw comparisons to California’s Proposition 8, the anti-gay-marriage measure that polls showed trailing in the final days of the November 2008 campaign. Even so, Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote.

“We’re doing even better in Maine than we were in California at this time,” said Maggie Gallagher, president of the National Organization for Marriage, a traditional-marriage group that backed Proposition 8 and now Question 1. “It turns out that about 2 [percent] to 8 percent of people don’t like to tell pollsters that they’re not onboard with gay marriage.”

The Maine ballot may also work in Question 1’s favor. The election features six ballot measures and no candidates, a recipe for low voter turnout, which tends to favor conservatives. Voters in the 18- to 24-year-old range represent the biggest backers of gay marriage, but they’re also the least likely to show up in low-profile election years.

What’s more, the Maine ballot also features Question 4, the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights, a high-profile, anti-government-spending measure that is expected to draw conservatives to the polls.

“The Republicans have been smart about putting measures on the ballot to get their people out,” Mr. Debnam said.

Working in favor of the gay-marriage vote is fundraising. The ‘No on 1’ Protect Maine Equality political action committee has raised $2.7 million, more than twice as much as Stand for Marriage Maine, the pro-Question 1 group, which had collected $1.14 million as of Oct. 13.

That disparity has given the ‘No on 1’ campaign the decided edge in television and radio ads and mailings, which could make the difference in a close race. The latest count showed the pro-gay-marriage campaign with nine television and radio ads and the opposition with five.

The campaign’s get-out-the-vote effort has targeted the state’s many private and public college campuses, said Mark Sullivan, spokesman for the ‘No on 1’ campaign.

“We’ve been focused on every demographic, but we’ve found young people are very energized by the measure,” Mr. Sullivan said. “We’ve reached out to every campus that we possibly can.”

Gay marriage also has the backing of the Maine political establishment, starting with the governor and Democrat-controlled Legislature. The Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News also have come out against Question 1.

“Limiting marriage to a man and a woman would not make families led by same-sex couples go away,” said the Portland Press Herald in an Oct. 18 editorial. “It would just keep them in a legally inferior position that is inconsistent with Maine’s tradition of equal protection under the law.”

Same-sex-marriage proponents scored victories in 2009 with the passage of bills in Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire. The Iowa Supreme Court also legalized gay marriage by court ruling. The Connecticut Supreme Court did the same in 2008.

Of the six states that have approved gay marriage, only Maine has a user-friendly referendum process. Maine law allows voters to place measures on the ballot by circulating petitions and doesn’t require the approval of the Legislature.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide