- The Washington Times - Monday, November 15, 2010

Bowing to political pressure from conservatives in his party and to voter anxiety over the federal budget, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday reversed course and supported a temporary ban on earmarks in order to show he is serious about cutting federal spending.

The decision was viewed as a victory for Sens. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican; Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican; and eight other conservatives - including six incoming freshman - who last week called on their colleagues in an open letter to adopt the ban.

“What I’ve concluded is that on the issue of congressional earmarks, as the leader of my party in the Senate, I have to lead first by example,” Mr. McConnell said shortly after the opening of a lame-duck session that could spill into December. “Nearly every day that the Senate’s been in session for the past two years, I have come down to this spot and said that Democrats are ignoring the wishes of the American people. When it comes to earmarks, I won’t be guilty of the same thing.”

Republicans suggested the political spotlight now will shift onto President Obama, who has signaled a willingness to work with Republicans against earmarking, but has been fuzzy about whether he will use the full force of the White House to prevent the practice and take on veteran members of the Democratic Party.

“It’s time for Congress to stop focusing on parochial pet projects, and instead focus on cutting spending, devolving power and decisions back to states, and working on national priorities, like entitlement and tax reform,” Mr. DeMint said after the announcement.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, had a different take.

“It is up to each senator whether or not they will support congressionally directed funding to their state,” said Reid’s spokesman, Jim Manley. “From delivering $100 million in military projects for Nevada to funding education and public transportation projects in the state, Sen. Reid makes no apologies for delivering for the people of Nevada. He will always fight to ensure the state’s needs are met.”

Though earmarks account for less than 1 percent of federal spending, they have become the poster child for the worst abuses of Congress, with some former members serving prison time for trading earmarks for gifts.

Mr. McConnell’s stance represents a remarkable change of heart for the Kentucky Republican. Earlier this year, he voted for and then against two different proposals aimed at ending the practice and has previously touted his ability to bring home the bacon.

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan spending watchdog, said that in the last three fiscal years, Mr. McConnell has pulled nearly $460 million of taxpayer-supported pork-barrel projects back to his state.

“I looked out the window to see if I could see his finger in the air, checking the political wind,” Mr. Ellis said jokingly on Monday. Then he added, “I think Sen. McConnell bowed to the political realities.”

Mr. Obama welcomed Mr. McConnell’s decision to “join me and members of both parties who support cracking down on wasteful earmark spending, which we can’t afford during these tough economic times.”

“But we can’t stop with earmarks, as they represent only part of the problem. In the days and weeks to come, I look forward to working with Democrats and Republicans to not only end earmark spending, but to find other ways to bring down our deficits for our children,” Mr. Obama said.

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, ushered a similar earmark ban through the House Republican caucus earlier this year and leaders have rolled out plans to extend it into the next Congress, where he is likely to be elevated to speaker.

“An earmark moratorium shows that elected officials are serious about restoring trust between the American people and those elected to represent them,” he said.

Speaking from the Senate floor on Monday, Mr. McConnell said, “I don’t apologize” for supporting pork projects in the past, but “there is simply no doubt that the abuse of this practice has caused Americans to view it as a symbol of the waste and the out-of-control spending that every Republican in Washington is determined to fight.”

Mr. McConnell made the announcement after a private, 90-minute meeting with incoming GOP senators, including Rand Paul of Kentucky and Marco Rubio of Florida - two of the “tea party” movement’s biggest midterm winners, who signed off on the open letter calling on party leaders to reject earmarks.

Following the meeting, Mr. Rubio said that anybody who gets elected has a responsibility to fulfill their campaign promises. “We all have obligations to come up here and be held accountable,” he said. “I think everybody understands that.”

By Monday evening, it seemed clear that with Mr. McConnell’s support, the earmark ban is now destined to be embraced by the 47-member Senate Republican Conference on Tuesday. Several members, previously on the fence, expressed support for the plan.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide