- The Washington Times - Wednesday, November 24, 2010


There is symbolism associated with earmarks. The symbolism revolves around the perception of corruption and the belief that corruption has become an integral part of how Congress works. Perception also revolves around the belief that Congress is incapable of rising above provincial concerns to address the large issues that face us unless it’s somehow “bought off” by the earmark process.

If earmarks are insignificant, why not swear off them? Why not apply a strong symbol of new thinking in Congress? Why not take advantage of the opportunity to begin to turn around the public’s negative perception of how Congress conducts its business? The failure to do so reinforces negative perceptions.

The pregnant question to Republicans from the electorate: Do they really get it, did they really hear the message? On the earmark issue, the answer, for now, is: not even close.


South Riding, Va.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide