- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 30, 2010


Let me get this straight. The Obama administration is sued to halt ongoing federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. It loses before a judge but appeals. The funding is allowed to continue until the appeals court decision.

The Obama administration imposes a moratorium on offshore oil drilling and is sued. It loses before a federal judge, imposes a more restrictive moratorium and appeals. The drilling cannot resume until the appeals court decision.

Both cases involve (a) potential or proven benefits to humans, (b) potential or proven dangers to humans, (c) jobs and economic activity and (d) loss of expertise if suspended. Why are the outcomes different? It seems the government preferentially gets its way pending appeal.


Portsmouth, Va.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide