- The Washington Times - Friday, August 26, 2011


Several states are planning to participate in a pilot program that provides breakfast, lunch and snacks to every public school student regardless of family income as long as at least 40 percent of the district’s students are considered disadvantaged.

While some may see this as a wonderful way to ensure that all children receive the nutrition they require, I consider it another unsustainable, unwarranted and expensive entitlement program that removes a traditional duty of responsible parenting: supporting one’s children.

If the government is to provide cradle-to-grave care, catering to every want and need of the family, we send the message that family rearing is optional.

The American people are being hit over the head with the fact that the government has no money and is on the verge of insolvency. Why in heaven’s name would reasonable people seek to expand the “right” to raise a family at the expense of others?


Upper Saint Clair, Pa.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide