- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 4, 2011


“Men need not apply” (Commentary, Wednesday) was right to criticize the federal government’s award of contracts based on sex in the Women-Owned Small Business Program (WOSB).

The study used by the government to justify completely excluding male businesses from contracts was stale and flawed. Its assumption that isolated data showing female underrepresentation was proof of discrimination against women, which justified affirmative action, ignored the Supreme Court’s 1989 Croson ruling. That ruling said it was “completely unrealistic” to expect groups to be represented in each industry in “proportion to their representation in the local population.”

The government’s reliance on old data violates federal court rulings declaring that affirmative action can’t be used as a “remedy” for discrimination unless the discrimination occurred recently. Rulings like Brunet v. Columbus (1993), which struck down a sex-based affirmative-action program, and Hammon v. Barry (1987), which struck down race-based affirmative action, clearly show as much.


Senior attorney

Competitive Enterprise Institute


Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide