- Associated Press - Sunday, December 11, 2011

PESHAWAR, Pakistan (AP) — A Pakistani Taliban spokesman on Sunday denied an earlier announcement by the militant group’s deputy chief that it was holding peace talks with the government.

The conflicting claims are a clear sign of splits within the movement, which could make it harder for Islamabad to strike a deal to end the violent insurgency gripping the country — although, possibly, easier to suppress it militarily.

The Pakistani government meanwhile said that the U.S. had vacated an air base used by American drones. Islamabad had ordered the Americans out in retaliation for U.S. airstrikes last month that accidentally killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

Pakistan‘s conflict with its branch of the Taliban is closely linked to the American-led war in Afghanistan. Past informal cease-fires have made it easier for Afghan militants sheltered by their Pakistani counterparts to attack U.S. forces across the border.

Consequently, while the U.S. has pushed for peace negotiations between the Afghan branch of the Taliban and Kabul, the possibility of similar talks between Islamabad and the Pakistani branch could stoke concern in Washington.

From Islamabad’s perspective, rising anger against the Americans increases the incentive to cut a deal with the Taliban, as many blame the conflict on their government’s alliance with Washington.

However, the government’s ability to negotiate with the clandestine militant movement will be made vastly more complicated by the Taliban‘s murky command structure and the difficulty in telling whether commanders who say they are willing to make peace actually have any authority on the ground.

Maulvi Faqir Mohammed, who has been recognized by both militants and officials as the deputy chief of the Pakistani Taliban, had said on Saturday that the group was in negotiations with the government. Mr. Mohammed, the first named commander to confirm talks, said an agreement to end the country’s brutal four-year insurgency was within striking distance.

Spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan denied Mr. Mohammed’s claims, saying there would be no negotiations until the government imposed Islamic law, or Shariah, in the country. The group says it wants to install a hard-line Islamist regime.

Mr. Ehsan has on several occasions over the past six months dismissed reports of peace talks by unnamed militant commanders and intelligence officials.

“Talks by a handful of people with the government cannot be deemed as the Taliban talking,” Mr. Ehsan told the Associated Press by telephone from an undisclosed location.

The group, which is closely allied with al Qaeda, has been behind much of the violence tearing apart Pakistan over the last 4½ years. At least 35,000 people have been killed in suicide bombings, other insurgent attacks and army offensives.

But military operations and U.S. drone strikes have weakened the Pakistani Taliban, which has splintered into more than 100 smaller factions, according to security officials, analysts and tribesmen from the insurgent heartland.

Mr. Mohammed’s main area of strength has been the Bajur tribal area along the Afghan border, but he reportedly fled to Afghanistan in recent years to escape army operations. He long has been identified as head of the Pakistani Taliban in Bajur and said a deal with the government there could be a “role model” for the rest of the border region.

But another commander, Mullah Dadullah, also now claims to be Taliban chief in Bajur. Mr. Dadullah contacted the AP on Sunday and denied that the group, also known as the Tehrik-e-Taliban, or TTP, was negotiating with the government.

“As TTP chief responsible for Bajur, I am categorically saying there are no talks going on between the government and the Tehrik-e-Taliban at the Bajur level or the central level,” Mr. Dadullah said, also speaking from an undisclosed location.

Mr. Ehsan, the spokesman, said Mr. Dadullah rather than Mr. Mohammed was the head of the Pakistani Taliban in Bajur.

Despite the Taliban‘s record of indiscriminate violence, much of it directed at civilians, there is political and public support for peace talks. In September, the weak civilian government announced it was prepared to “give peace a chance” with militants, pandering to right-wing Islamist parties and their supporters.

Government-militant talks could strain the already troubled relationship between Pakistan and the U.S.

Ties suffered a severe blow when NATO airstrikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers at two army posts along the Afghan border on Nov. 26. Pakistan retaliated by closing its Afghan border to NATO supplies and boycotting an international conference aimed at stabilizing Afghanistan.

It also gave the U.S. until Dec. 11 to vacate the Shamsi Air Base used by American drones in southwestern Balochistan province.

The Pakistani military said the last flight carrying U.S. personnel and equipment left Shamsi on Sunday and the base was taken over by the army.

The American ambassador had said previously the U.S. would do everything it could to vacate the base by the deadline. A U.S. Embassy representative could not be reached for comment Sunday.

Vacating Shamsi is not expected to significantly curtail drone attacks in Pakistan. The U.S. military used it to service drones that took off from Afghanistan heading to the border region and then could not make it back to base because of mechanical or weather difficulties.

Associated Press writer Abdul Sattar contributed to this report from Quetta, Pakistan.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide