- The Washington Times - Monday, December 5, 2011


J.D. Foster is correct: The repatriation tax holiday is not a stimulus (“Repatriation tax holiday not a stimulus,” Economy, Nov. 30). Nevertheless, the proposed bill supporting a tax holiday would do tremendous good for the economy as a whole.

Opponents of the tax holiday argue the 2004 holiday produced few economic benefits and increased the incentive to shift income overseas. They portray large companies like Cisco as “tax dodgers.” This is a misleading argument: U.S. subsidiaries operating abroad already pay corporate income taxes to their host countries. The additional tax is simply a cash grab by the United States government.

In fact, there’s clear evidence from a wealth of academic studies that tax holidays have a positive effect on the economy. A tax holiday on the repatriation of foreign corporate earnings is a sound policy, but it is only a temporary first step in a needed overhaul of our international corporate tax policy.


Midwest director

Center on Finance, Insurance and Real Estate

The Heartland Institute


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide