- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The White House retreated Wednesday from President Obama’s vow to veto any short-term increase in the nation’s debt limit, opening the door wider to a bipartisan Senate compromise plan to boost borrowing for now in exchange for a promise by Congress to cut spending later.

“If both sides agree to something significant, we will support the measures needed to finalize details,” said presidential spokesman Jay Carney. “We believe a short-term extension absent an agreement to a larger deal is unacceptable.”

Last week, Mr. Obama declared unequivocally that he would not sign a temporary extension of the debt ceiling. He called the interim approach a shaky way for the U.S. to “manage our affairs.”

When House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican, urged the president in a meeting two days later to reconsider because the government is nearing default, Mr. Obama retorted, “Eric, don’t call my bluff.”

But minimal progress has been made in almost daily talks toward a deal with congressional Republicans to raise the debt ceiling of $14.29 trillion by the deadline of Aug. 2. The president’s rough deadline is Friday for reaching an agreement that can move through Congress in time.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and a number of private business groups have warned of disastrous consequences for the government’s credit rating and for the economy as a whole if the debt ceiling is not raised. Many Republicans opposed to increasing the government’s borrowing limit say the fears are overblown.

The president is seeking a deal that would raise the debt limit by $2.5 trillion through the 2012 elections while cutting spending as much as $4 trillion over 10 years and raising taxes by more than $1 trillion. Asked whether a short-term hike in the debt limit would reduce the chances of significant long-term deficit reduction, Mr. Carney said, “That would be a shame. We believe that we can get more than that. If we do not, we are going to continue to fight for that, because we have to deal with our deficits, we have to deal with our debt, and we have to do it in a balanced way.”

The White House clarified later that the president would approve an extension of borrowing of perhaps only a few days to allow a deal in Congress to be completed.

Mr. Obama summoned House and Senate Democratic leaders to the White House on Wednesday afternoon for more talks, a day after House Republicans approved a measure - strongly backed by tea party activists - to cut next year’s budget by $111 billion, cap spending and mandate balanced federal budgets. GOP leaders were expected to meet with the president separately later in the day.

The House-approved “cut, cap and balance” plan, which would raise the debt limit by $2.4 trillion, faces almost certain failure in the Democrat-controlled Senate when it comes up for a vote Saturday, and Mr. Obama has promised a veto if the measure reaches his desk. Although more senators are rallying to a bipartisan “Gang of Six” proposal to cut spending by $4 trillion over 10 years and raise taxes more than $1 trillion, House Republicans have little appetite for that approach.

Mr. Obama endorsed the framework of the Gang of Six proposal on Tuesday, but his spokesman cautioned Wednesday that not all the details are known.
“If the will is there, we can get down to negotiating the details,” Mr. Carney said.

One detail that’s firm is a feature that would lower the top marginal tax rate from 35 percent to 29 percent. In the debt discussions, however, Mr. Obama consistently has pushed for an increase in taxes for top wage earners.

Mr. Cantor’s office issued a statement Wednesday claiming that Mr. Obama had “endorsed” the lower tax rates. Asked whether Mr. Obama is willing to cut tax rates for the wealthiest Americans, Mr. Carney insisted that the president hadn’t endorsed any details of the “Gang of Six” plan.

“I’m not going to get into the itemized specifics of their proposal,” Mr. Carney said. “The president does support tax reform.”

The new tone from the White House on Wednesday on a temporary deal also appeared to boost the prospects of a “fail-safe” plan advanced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, to boost borrowing without firm spending cuts attached. Their proposal would effectively authorize the president to raise the debt limit by $2.5 trillion in three phases by the end of 2012.

“We acknowledge that we have to be sure that there is a backup plan, because the United States will not default,” Mr. Carney said.

Some conservative lawmakers are furious with Mr. McConnell for issuing the proposal last week, contending it would allow Mr. Obama to continue a spending spree without a commitment to significant deficit reduction.

While the Gang of Six plan was gaining momentum in the Senate, some lawmakers pointed out that it is not yet a piece of legislation and that they were reluctant to sign on.
Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the senior Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said the bipartisan Senate plan has “serious flaws.”

Mr. Sessions said the plan makes broad and misleading assumptions, particularly when tabulating spending cuts and how much tax revenue the plan would generate.

“After months of their meeting and working, I had sincerely hoped the Gang of Six would come forward with an actual legislative proposal,” he said. “Unfortunately, we have only vague language and talking points that create more questions than answers.”

But Mr. Obama faces heat on his left flank as well. Many liberals said he has agreed to tax cuts that go much too far.

Sen. Bernard Sanders, Vermont independent and one of the most liberal members of Congress, issued a statement Wednesday to mockingly “congratulate” Republicans on the bipartisan panel for “their long-term goal of dismantling every major social program relevant to working families.”

Richard Trumka, head of the AFL-CIO, blasted the emerging compromise.

“We keep seeing bipartisan support for plans like the so-called ‘Gang of Six’ that cut Social Security benefits, kill jobs, give tax incentives for corporations to export good jobs overseas, tax health benefits, and lower tax rates for billionaires and corporations,” Mr. Trumka said in a statement. “There’s no shared sacrifice here. The only sacred cows being gored are working people, the middle class, seniors and the poor.”

• Sean Lengell contributed to this report.

• Dave Boyer can be reached at dboyer@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2022 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide