- Associated Press - Tuesday, May 24, 2011

THE HAGUE — Dutch courts have not prosecuted a blasphemy case since putting a novelist on trial in 1966 for a story about wanting to have sex with God, who had taken the form of a donkey.

Gerard Reve was acquitted, but more than 40 years after his landmark trial Parliament is still not ready to scrap the blasphemy law, which bars scorn against any religion.

In a country that cherishes freedom of expression, plans to repeal the 1932 law, which mandates a maximum sentence of three months in prison for a convicted “scornful blasphemer,” have foundered in the latest round of party politics.

Blasphemy laws have taken on a somewhat sinister hue in liberal countries after what critics call their misuse in countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran to persecute minorities or settle scores.

Two prominent Pakistani politicians have been killed this year for their campaign to change blasphemy laws that make it a capital offense to insult Islam.

Yet governing parties gave up their hope to delete the law from Dutch jurisprudence in an apparent concession to a tiny fundamentalist Christian party, which emerged from elections this week holding the balance of power in the Senate.

Boris van der Ham, one of three lawmakers who proposed dumping the blasphemy law, called it a “dead letter” and a legal anachronism that no longer belongs in the progressive Netherlands.

“We don’t think religious opinion should have more protection than nonreligious opinion,” he told the Associated Press.

But the strict Calvinist Political Reformed Party, or SGP, whose single senator now holds the key to success or failure for government legislation in the 75-seat Senate, thinks otherwise.

The party’s leader, Kees van der Staaij, is one of a minority of people in this largely secular country of 16 million who publicly support the blasphemy law, which he calls “the legal expression of the conviction that some things are holy.”

“The name of God is holy,” the party says on its website. “Insulting God, as he is portrayed in the Bible, must be combatted. The ban on blasphemy should be maintained.”

The SGP is sometimes seen as a throwback to the time when the Netherlands was a deeply religious nation and political parties reflected the religious divide among Calvinists, Dutch Reform and Catholics. The party was rebuked last year by the country’s Supreme Court for refusing to let women hold leadership roles.

Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberal Party, which supported scrapping the blasphemy law before the Senate elections, quietly dropped the issue as it sought to muster majority support. Unlike Parliament’s more powerful Second Chamber, the Senate does not formulate legislation but it has the power to veto bills.

Mr. Rutte’s party denies it is pandering to the SGP and says it plans to unveil a new policy on freedom of expression later this year.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide