- The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 11, 2012

With the general election campaign unofficially under way, Mitt Romney’s effort to win back female voters got off to a rocky start Wednesday when his campaign was stumped temporarily over whether he supports the 3-year-old Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Democrats jumped on the incident — which came as Mr. Romney’s domestic policy staffers were attacking President Obama’s jobs record when it comes to female workers — saying it calls into question the former Massachusetts governor’s own commitment to a fair shake for the fairer sex.

The Romney staffers paused when asked what Mr. Romney’s position was on the law, then promised to get back to reporters with an answer. Within an hour, they had it: Mr. Romney would not repeal the law, which was the first legislation Mr. Obama signed in 2009.

The miniflap underscores a critical reality for both campaigns: Women are a majority of the population and an early battleground in this year’s election, and Mr. Obama’s recent success in winning their support has boosted his overall standings in the polls.

“In every presidential election since 1980, there’s been a gender gap where women are far more likely to favor Democrats than men are,” said Jennifer Lawless, director of the Women & Politics Institute at American University’s School of Public Affairs. “The margin by which they favor the Democrat is what decides elections.”

Ms. Lawless said now that former Sen. Rick Santorum has dropped out of the race, essentially sealing Mr. Romney as the Republican nominee, it gives Mr. Romney a chance to try to reconnect with female voters. When Mr. Santorum was in the race, she said, the focus on conservative social issues was hurting the entire Republican field.

In that respect, the campaign’s pause over the Lilly Ledbetter law could come back to haunt Mr. Romney. Ms. Lawless said it reminded her of the 2008 campaign, when the Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, similarly seemed stumped when asked about his vote against forcing insurance companies that covered male impotence drugs to also cover birth control.

That year, Mr. Obama won 56 percent of women’s votes but just 49 percent of men’s votes.

This year, the president is making a very public push for female voters, including arguing that the Republicans are engaged in a war against women. In an event with businesswomen last week, the president pointed to his signature on the Lilly Ledbetter Act and said there was more to come.

“We’re pushing for legislation to give women more tools to fight pay discrimination. And we’ve encouraged companies to make workplaces more flexible so women don’t have to choose between being a good employee or a good mom,” he said.

The Lilly Ledbetter Act passed on the strength of Democratic votes — just eight Republicans in the House and Senate combined voted for the legislation in 2009.

The law overturned a Supreme Court decision that said those suing for discrimination had 180 days from the first instance of discrimination to file a suit. Under the new law, the 180-day period resets with each new instance of discrimination, meaning women have a bigger time window in which to sue.

According to early evaluations,the law has not made much of a dent in improving women’s pay. Between 2009, when the legislation was signed, and 2010, the pay gap between men and women closed by 0.4 percentage points — about the same pace as in previous years.

A bigger issue going forward is a companion measure, the Paycheck Fairness Act, which Mr. Obama addressed in his remarks last week. Senate Republicans blocked the bill during the lame-duck session of Congress in 2010.

It would give women more instances in which they could sue based on pay discrepancies — though Republicans said it would result in the burden being shifted to companies to prove they weren’t discriminating. This would create a legal nightmare for small businesses, the Republicans said.

Asked about that legislation on Wednesday, the Romney campaign did not provide an answer about his stance on the bill.

On the campaign trail Wednesday, Mr. Romney argued that women should reject Mr. Obama’s bid for a second term because of his performance on the economy during his first term.

“The real war on women is being waged by the president’s failed economic policies,” he said in Connecticut. “The percentage of jobs lost by women in the president’s three years, three and a half years, 92.3 percent of all the jobs lost during the Obama years have been lost by women.”

The Romney campaign reached that number by taking the total drop in the number of people employed between January 2009 and now — 740,000 — and said the drop among women alone during that period was 683,000, or 92.3 percent.

At the White House, press secretary Jay Carney rejected Mr. Romney’s calculations and pointed back to the president’s signature on the Lilly Ledbetter Act as evidence of where his priorities are.

“I’m not sure what charge it isthat someone’s attempting to make here, but the president’s record on women in the economy is very strong, and it begins with literally the first thing he did as president,” Mr. Carney said.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide