- The Washington Times - Monday, April 16, 2012


Last week, the White House politicized the fact that President Obama’s tax rate of 20.5 percent was slightly lower than his secretary’s, despite his having earned roughly $789,000, to further its argument for the “Buffett rule” (” ‘Buffett rule’ is producing Capitol gains,” Web, Sunday). However, when pressed on whether Mr. Obama should make a donation to the Treasury to rectify this wrong, Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod said the president would do no such thing. I contend this is a blatant act of hypocrisy by the president.

When calling for higher taxes, there are two arguments to make: one, that they make economic sense; two, that higher taxes on the wealthy is the “fair” thing to do. If a politician calls for higher taxes as a matter of economics, he is engaging in a policy matter. But this has not been Mr. Obama’s strategy. Instead, the president calls for “fairness,” implying that raising tax rates on the rich is a matter of morality.

As human beings, we have an obligation to do the moral thing. If low taxes are “unfair,” as Mr. Obama argues, then the president has a moral obligation to do the right thing by making a donation to the Treasury. Unless he does this, Mr. Obama is guilty of the very thing he considers immoral, which is the essence of hypocrisy.





Click to Read More

Click to Hide