- Associated Press - Monday, February 27, 2012

MEXICO CITY — When neighbors in the hills east of Mexico City saw backhoes ripping up pre-Hispanic relics for a highway, they did something unexpected in a country where construction projects often bulldoze through ruins: They launched protests to stop the digging and demanded an accounting of what is there.

Dozens of residents set up a protest camp and filed complaints with state and federal officials, demanding the highway be rerouted, hoping that studies of the site can help solve an age-old riddle about their town.

A story passed down for generations says Amecameca once stood on another site and was abandoned after an eruption of the Popocatepetl volcano that looms over the town.

Local residents suspect the answer lies in the ruins, believed to date from 700 to 1,100 A.D. and located on the outskirts of the present-day settlement.

“This represents a possibility for the people to recover that part of Amecameca’s history,” said activist Rebeca Lopez of the local preservationist group Guardians of the Volcanos.

“We could find out what happened there, if it was evacuated or covered.”

The idea is not far-fetched. Other settlements around Mexico City have been found half-covered in lava from volcanos that ring the valley.

Only about 120 square yards of the estimated 5-acre site have been excavated, revealing stone and clay footings for houses that may have supported upper walls of wood or clay wattle.

But the very ordinariness may mean the site is unusually significant.

“What makes this important is that it is a residential area, not a ceremonial or religious site,” said Felipe Echenique, a historian with the National Institute of Anthropology and History, or INAH, which is in charge of reviewing the site.

“In Mexico, we really have very little evidence of how the cities really were, or how people lived.”

Ancient towns disappeared

Towering pyramids in Mexico like Chichen Itza or temple complexes like Uxmal are well known, but the vast urban centers that supported those ceremonial sites have largely disappeared.

The housing compounds were apparently constructed by one of the still-unnamed cultures that populated the Valley of Mexico long before the Aztecs appeared in the area in 1325 and founded Tenochtitlan, the precursor to Mexico City.

Ms. Lopez said researchers called in by the INAH to investigate the site of the proposed roadway have found ceramic pots, bones and a stone serpent’s head, suggesting that the god Quetzacoatl, “the Feathered Serpent,” may have been worshipped there centuries before the Aztecs paid him homage.

The few excavations of residential areas carried out so far in Mexico have yielded fascinating details.

In Teotihuacan - one of the biggest pre-Hispanic cities located northeast of Mexico City - some houses appear to have been illuminated by narrow doorways that opened onto central patios with shallow pools that acted as “water mirrors” to direct light inside the rooms. Techniques for building windows were apparently not yet known.

Investigators say similar discoveries could emerge from Amecameca.

“In what has been excavated so far, there are some strange settlement patterns that are emerging,” said Mr. Echenique.

Between one housing compound and another, researchers found an empty area that contained no relics - something that would be unusual in a densely populated area unless it represented a border between neighborhoods, a street, or contained some long-vanished wood structure.

Progress has often trumped history in Mexico, where roads have regularly been pushed through ruins.

In Mexico City, the lava-buried remains of the ancient Cuicuilco culture, with its famed round pyramid, are crowded and partly covered by shopping malls, housing developments, a major freeway and even a college for archaeologists.

Protesters guard site

The Amecameca protesters have set up a camp to guard against construction work or looters and to explain the ruins to passers-by. They are asking the road be rerouted.

“The planned route wouldn’t have to be changed that much,” Ms. Lopez said.

Authorities have not yet commented on the demands, and the builders of the roadway, known as the Mexican Beltway, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

INAH spokesman Arturo Mendez said that “in almost every project of this type, there are going to be discoveries of pre-Hispanic material.” Thousands of years of settlement have left potentially interesting relics scattered across the region.

The Institute normally sends in a rescue project to excavate, recover any significant items, rebury the site for possible future exploration, and then allow the construction to continue.

That is basically what happened in the 1960s to Maya ruins known as “Tortuguero” in the southern state of Tabasco. It was split in half and largely covered by highway construction.

The site happened to hold a stone monolith known as Monument Six, which contains one of only a couple of known references in Mayan hieroglyphs to the date 2012, which some believe marks the end of the Mayan Long Count calendar and a possible apocalypse.

The inscription has become so famous that the Tabasco state government now uses it on advertisements to promote tourism, even though the stone fragment itself sits in a museum in the nearby city of Villahermosa and little is left of the ceremonial site where it was excavated.

The people of Amecameca say they want to prevent that from happening to them.

Maria de los Angeles Eusebio, 55, a retired anthropologist, is one of the local residents who have camped out for the last week to prevent construction machinery from going through.

Equipped with tents, coffee “and lots and lots of blankets,” residents are staying day and night, through wind, rain and cold, to ensure the remains of their ancestors’ city are not destroyed.

“We don’t want them to just bury this and run the highway over the top of it,” said Ms. Eusebio.

“We want them to return the artifacts, so we can display them in a museum for the community.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide