- The Washington Times - Monday, February 6, 2012

The Pentagon on Monday launched a new campaign — in bursts of 140 characters per message.

The Defense Department (@DeptofDefense) held its first Twitter town hall, and the nearly hour-long session addressed questions from “don’t ask, don’t tell” to the Middle East to cyber security.

“…important to discuss national security matters with American public, service members, and #milfams #isthatallyougot?#askdod,” Pentagon press secretary George Little, or @PentagonPresSec, tweeted.

On Syria, Mr. Little first tweeted: “@13monsters asks about Libya v. Syria. Each difficult situation, but approaches to dealing with crises must be case-by-case.”

He followed up with: “U.S. has made clear that Syrian regime must stop its ruthlessness, and we condemn violence against innocents.”

On Iran, he tweeted: “Our focus is on diplomatic and economic pressure, which appears to be working.”

@PentagonPresSec also addressed budget cuts, tweeting that further defense cuts would be “disastrous” for national defense and military families: “if Congress doesn’t act DoD will face over $1T in cuts. That’d be disastrous for ntnl defense and #milfam.”

Brevity is essential in using Twitter. The mini-blogging social network limits individual messages to 140 characters.

Mr. Little gave a shout-out to @Military1Source, which he said helps troops and their families avoid money problems by offering 12-session finance classes free. He also referred them to @DCoEpage and @DeptVetAffairs for more information on post traumatic stress.

Mr. Little engaged in a back-and-forth with one tweeter over the Pentagon’s recently repealed ban on openly serving gays, known as “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT).

“@JoshSeefried asks about #DADT benefits for same sex partners in mil. #troops can desig[nate] some bnefits regrdlss of sexual orientation,” Mr. Little tweeted.

@DeptofDefense followed with a link to a website with more information on designating benefits to partners.

Still, Josh Seefried, co-founder and co-director of OutServe, an association serving active duty gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender service members, said he got no answer.

“No Answer. The [Comprehensive Review Working Group] outlined benefits such as mil-mil asignmts that could b given for same-sex couples, that was my question,” he told the Washington Times.

Despite being unable to receive a satisfactory answer in 140 characters, Mr. Seefried managed to elicit a response from the bombarded Mr. Little, who answered very few questions from the news media during the session.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide