- The Washington Times - Tuesday, June 12, 2012


It appears that the contestants for this fall’s presidential election are now set. At this point, I find myself in agreement with more of what Mitt Romney says than what President Obama says he stands for. But one thing still bothers me: not knowing Mr. Romney’s beliefs on immigration - especially illegal immigration.

Mr. Romney made some fairly strong statements on the matter during the primaries, but now that the dust has settled, things have grown strangely silent on this topic. He needs to clarify this without delay, so those of us who are still vacillating with regard to the candidate we will choose in November will know for sure. What does he think about amnesty for illegal aliens? What about temporary visas for seasonal farm workers, or increased border security so people find it harder to cross into the United States? What about the “anchor baby” law, chain immigration, deportation of those here illegally, E-Verify and so on?

Very germane to all this is Mr. Romney’s pick for his vice-presidential candidate. If Mr. Romney says he is going to be tough on illegal immigration but then picks a pro-amnesty partner, what does that mean? He needs to tell us now, firmly, where he stands on this very important issue.


Weippe, Idaho

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide