- Associated Press - Thursday, June 7, 2012

A five-year farm and food bill that would revamp the federal safety net for farmers and eliminate direct government payments for idle crop fields took its first step toward passage Thursday in the Senate.

A 90-8 vote to officially begin debate opens the way for what could be several weeks of attempts to amend proposed legislation that spends about $100 billion a year on crop insurance, conservation and nutrition programs.

The measure would save $23 billion over a 10-year period from current spending levels. Some of those savings would come from eliminating the current system, in which farmers get direct payments from the government regardless of whether they plant a crop.

“This is not your father’s farm bill,” said Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow, Michigan Democrat, who crafted the legislation with the top Republican on the committee, Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas.

Mr. Roberts said the bill cuts or streamlines more than 100 programs, including combining four commodity protection plans into one and reducing conservation programs from 23 to 13.

The old direct farm subsidy program would be replaced by a new plan that would place greater stress on subsidized crop insurance and a new program that would compensate farmers when revenues from planted fields fall below levels determined by a five-year average.

The farm bill, which differs from many bills in not splitting Congress among party lines, could become one of the few major measures to reach the president’s desk before the November elections. But it won’t be easy.

Senators are likely to use the bill as a vehicle to take up unrelated issues, such as looming automatic cuts in the defense budget set off by the failed negotiations in Congress last year to reduce spending. Southern senators are also expected to seek changes in the new revenue protection program, which they say discriminates against Southern crops such as rice and peanuts.

Other legislators are seeking reductions in the crop insurance program under which the government shoulders more than 60 percent of farmers’ insurance premiums and protest the bill’s cuts of more than $4 billion over 10 years in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps.

About 80 percent of the $100 billion in annual spending under the bill would go to nutrition programs. Some 46 million Americans receive food stamps, a number that has risen sharply during the economic downturn.

The House Agriculture Committee is expected to write a farm bill more sympathetic to Southern growers, who want to keep aspects of the existing system where farmers are paid when prices dip below certain target levels. House Republicans also say that more savings can be squeezed out of the food stamp program.

The current farm act expires at the end of September.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide